Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

30 August 2017

• 00:18   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Robert Haas
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] Improving overflow checks when adding tuple to PGresult Re: [GENERAL] Retrieving query results Tom Lane
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 02:14   Re: [HACKERS] Improving overflow checks when adding tuple to PGresultRe: [GENERAL] Retrieving query results Michael Paquier
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Robert Haas
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting Dmitry Dolgov
• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers Robert Haas
• 03:14   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: [HACKERS] Make pg_regress print a connstring with sockdir Robert Haas
• 04:06   [HACKERS] Improve history file reasons when doing promotion Michael Paquier
• 05:13   Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size Andres Freund
• 05:27   [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhat broken Tomas Vondra
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhatbroken Andres Freund
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Thomas Munro
• 06:11   Re: [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhatbroken Tomas Vondra
• 06:13   Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected Amit Langote
• 06:19   Re: [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhatbroken Andres Freund
• 06:23   Re: [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhatbroken Tomas Vondra
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Michael Paquier
• 06:36   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error Craig Ringer
• 06:36   [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (was increasing thedefault WAL segment size) Andres Freund
• 06:49   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Michael Paquier
• 07:00   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 07:06   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Andres Freund
• 07:14   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Michael Paquier
• 07:16   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Andres Freund
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior Michael Paquier
• 08:20   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Peter Eisentraut
• 08:22   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Thomas Munro
• 08:32   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization Masahiko Sawada
• 08:36   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Amit Langote
• 09:03   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Robert Haas
• 09:52   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Michael Paquier
• 09:56   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 10:45   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Andres Freund
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Magnus Hagander
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization Fabien COELHO
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers Amit Kapila
• 14:20   Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected Etsuro Fujita
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Amit Langote
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Amit Khandekar
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila
• 16:58   [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Pavan Deolasee
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actualbehavior David Steele
• 17:39   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 17:41   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Robert Haas
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Amit Kapila
• 17:50   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas
• 17:55   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between tablecorrelation and partial indexes Robert Haas
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Pavan Deolasee
• 18:02   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Alvaro Herrera
• 18:02   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Amit Khandekar
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension Antonin Houska
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] ALTER INDEX .. SET STATISTICS ... behaviour Alexander Korotkov
• 18:31   Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Alexander Korotkov
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Robert Haas
• 19:20   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Tom Lane
• 19:22   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Ashutosh Bapat
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Tom Lane
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error Alvaro Herrera
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Robert Haas
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error Alvaro Herrera
• 19:58   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Tom Lane
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Robert Haas
• 20:43   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions amul sul
• 21:19   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Robert Haas
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) Andres Freund
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Robert Haas
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Sokolov Yura
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Robert Haas
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Robert Haas
• 22:29   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Ashutosh Bapat