Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzm+xNHvZL3tA=5DcFL5rQYsc-VhbWKxq_Fdz7sddFvnUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Eh, if you want to optimize it for the case where debug output is not
> enabled, make sure to use ereport() not elog().  ereport()
> short-circuits evaluation of arguments, whereas elog() does not.

I should do that, but it's still not really noticeable.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order