Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoabX2i3Wef2v7Bn7NYYxO1zG23icMcGwA6k4s0gK-gOxQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Parallel worker error  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's quite possible that I don't understand the differences in "role" and
> "session authorization", but it still looks like a bug to me. May be
> SerializeGUCState() should check if SetRoleIsActive is true and only then
> save the role information?

Ugh.  Well, this is definitely a bug, but I'm not sure if that's the right fix.

Mutually interdependent GUCs are bad news.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error