Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSdxbmA3U2iP60P5kyBVEWZkeuP3HfR+kmRJxJYTkOTCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It'd be nice to replace both with fls() or flsl(), though it's
> annoying to have to think about long vs int64 etc.  We already use
> fls() in two places and supply an implementation in src/port/fls.c for
> platforms that lack it (Windows?), but not the long version.

Yes, you can complain about MSVC compilation here.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhatbroken
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error