Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size)
Date
Msg-id b4570985-a4dd-98ae-c7f9-539d5e9c6275@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (was increasing thedefault WAL segment size)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 8/29/17 20:36, Andres Freund wrote:
> So the question is whether we want {max,min}_wal_size be sized in
> multiples of segment sizes or as a proper byte size.  I'm leaning
> towards the latter.

I'm not sure what the question is or what its impact would be.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification