Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

31 August 2017

• 00:16   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete Peter Geoghegan
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Robert Haas
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete Robert Haas
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Robert Haas
• 02:18   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Peter Geoghegan
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete Peter Geoghegan
• 03:28   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Alvaro Herrera
• 03:33   [HACKERS] pg_upgrade changes can it use CREATE EXTENSION? Regina Obe
• 03:33   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Robert Haas
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade changes can it use CREATE EXTENSION? Tom Lane
• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Peter Geoghegan
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problemswhen copying files >2GB. Michael Paquier
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Michael Paquier
• 05:08   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Bossart, Nathan
• 05:35   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands David G. Johnston
• 05:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problemswhen copying files >2GB. Alvaro Herrera
• 05:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problemswhen copying files >2GB. Michael Paquier
• 05:52   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Michael Paquier
• 05:59   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Peter Geoghegan
• 06:37   Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior Michael Paquier
• 06:38   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Robert Haas
• 06:56   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Peter Geoghegan
• 07:42   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization Masahiko Sawada
• 07:52   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Bossart, Nathan
• 08:12   [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor Tatsuro Yamada
• 08:23   [HACKERS] document and use SPI_result_code_string() Peter Eisentraut
• 08:53   Re: [HACKERS] Back-branch release notes up for review Noah Misch
• 09:02   [HACKERS] code cleanup empty string initializations Peter Eisentraut
• 09:04   Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN Bruce Momjian
• 09:15   Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions Noah Misch
• 09:17   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 09:19   Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions Noah Misch
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitionsordering Peter Eisentraut
• 10:16   [HACKERS] generated columns Peter Eisentraut
• 10:53   Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade changes can it use CREATE EXTENSION? Regina Obe
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE Jing Wang
• 11:53   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Amit Kapila
• 12:02   [HACKERS] Hooks to track changed pages for backup purposes Andrey Borodin
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Dilip Kumar
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Ashutosh Bapat
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Amit Khandekar
• 13:23   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Masahiko Sawada
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization Fabien COELHO
• 13:36   Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order Amit Langote
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] Range Merge Join v1 Jeff Davis
• 16:02   [HACKERS] CurrentUserId may be invalid during the rest of a session Richard Guo
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size Beena Emerson
• 17:49   [HACKERS] log_destination=file Magnus Hagander
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions Simon Riggs
• 18:19   Re: [HACKERS] Function to move the position of a replication slot Magnus Hagander
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes. Nikolay Shaplov
• 18:34   Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file Tom Lane
• 18:40   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions amul sul
• 18:40   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes. Fabien COELHO
• 18:40   Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file Magnus Hagander
• 18:49   Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file Tom Lane
• 18:52   Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 18:53   [HACKERS] multiple target of VACUUM command Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II Thomas Munro
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Jeevan Ladhe
• 19:44   Re: [HACKERS] generated columns Greg Stark
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] multiple target of VACUUM command Michael Paquier
• 20:44   Re: [HACKERS] Hooks to track changed pages for backup purposes Michael Paquier
• 21:09   [HACKERS] Assorted leaks and weirdness in parallel execution Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Bossart, Nathan
• 22:22   Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 Andreas Karlsson
• 23:46   Re: [HACKERS] Assorted leaks and weirdness in parallel execution Robert Haas
• 23:52   [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Andreas Karlsson
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Robert Haas