Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> >> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
> >> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
> >> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
> >> messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
> >
> > Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf
> > is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed
> > this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
>
> So, perhaps it would be better to fix that before the next point release?
Sure, I'll get it done on Friday, or tomorrow if I can manage it.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
