On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
>> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
>> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
>> messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
>
> Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf
> is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed
> this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
So, perhaps it would be better to fix that before the next point release?
--
Michael
