Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ1QVB5Re9=X4Nvh8tESdONdUchi+=Z7QPZg0-Hpyv3Mw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Here are the patches revised a bit. I have esp changed the variable
> names and arguments to reflect their true role in the functions. Also
> updated prologue of expand_single_inheritance_child() to mention
> "has_child". Let me know if those changes look good.

Sure.  Committed as you have it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: bgw_type (was Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher setapplication_name?)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity