Re: [HACKERS] sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity
Date
Msg-id 32577.1504211611@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> As an aside, is there a reason why the archiver process is not included
> in pg_stat_activity?

It's not connected to shared memory.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actualbehavior
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++