Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions
Date
Msg-id 20170831031928.GF3963697@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:44:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Today's run has finished with the same failure:
> > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dangomushi&dt=2017-08-27%2018%3A00%3A13
> > Attached is a patch to make this code path wait that the transaction
> > has been replayed. We could use as well synchronous_commit = apply,
> > but I prefer the solution of this patch with a wait query.
> 
> I have added an open item for this issue for PG10. The 2PC tests in
> src/test/recovery are new in PG10, introduced by 3082098.

[Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Álvaro,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitionsordering