Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date
Msg-id f5e67b91-ab88-246a-1aa3-e5ade0a3c3cc@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/16/17 19:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> Do we allow streaming replication among different OS?
> 
> No. WAL is a binary format.
> 
>> I thought it is
>> required that primary and standbys are same platform (in my
>> understanding this means the same hardware architecture and OS) in
>> streaming replication.
> 
> Yep, I recall the same requirement.

He meant logical replication, but the code in question here is the same
for streaming replication, or whatever it's called.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements