Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTz1RoDTJca=DqezTUuccoCZ2tAq0qzmCp7hs=s=t3yhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> Do we allow streaming replication among different OS?

No. WAL is a binary format.

> I thought it is
> required that primary and standbys are same platform (in my
> understanding this means the same hardware architecture and OS) in
> streaming replication.

Yep, I recall the same requirement.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Server crash due to SIGBUS(Bus Error) when trying toaccess the memory created using dsm_create().
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't force-assign transactionid when exporting a snapshot.