Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date
Msg-id 20170814222955.sowcmnabfdgmlmdn@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 2017-08-11 13:26:29 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-08-11 16:20:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I wrote:
> > > So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
> > > to plug it into ExecReScan.  From which we may draw depressing conclusions
> > > about how much it's been tested.
> > 
> > While I'm bitching ... the code coverage report at
> > 
> > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html
> > 
> > also leaves one with less than a warm feeling about the extent of test
> > coverage on this file.  heap_compare_slots isn't invoked even once?
> 
> I complained about this before at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170401022605.4wag26gtyzhny7ue%40alap3.anarazel.de
> but I just noticed that Rushabh appears to have sent a patch adding
> coverage. Missed that somehow, will apply.

And pushed (to both 10 and master).

- Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: myprofmailbox@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14779: Can't Backup Database
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14779: Can't Backup Database