Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQf_zKUsopaGNjEFM_nyoDk5H+51Ng4fv8uDL_iUmnJ5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> He meant logical replication,
>
> Oh I could not find he meant logical replication in the original
> report.

The second message of the thread says so, but the first does not
mention logical replication at all.
From here are mentioned PG 9.6 and pg_basebackup:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHBggj8g2T+ZDcACZ2FmzX9CTxkWjKBsHd6NkYB4i9Ojf6K1Fw@mail.gmail.com.
Explaining the confusion.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to move the position of a replication slot
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to move the position of a replication slot