Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT=cj06jkmbXf6uVbCZWTZWKw-NEWg5GNUXu4Kij7VekQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Perhaps, for v11, we should actually make sure there's no memory context
> etc set during _PG_init() to catch such problems earlier? It's a bit
> nasty to only see them if the shared library is preloaded and/or
> parallelism is in use.

Yeah, some prevention like that would be a good idea for module
developers. We could also check for a higher-level thing like being
sure that there is no transaction context?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers