Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date
Msg-id 18650.1502995942@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Nope, spoke too soon.  See buildfarm.

> Whoa, that's not good.

Ah-hah, I see my dromedary box is one of the ones failing, so I'll
have a look there.  I can't reproduce it on my other machines.

I'm a bit suspicious that it's got something to do with getting
a different number of workers during restart.  Whether that's
the issue or not, though, it sure seems like a rescan leaks an
unpleasantly large amount of memory.  I wonder if we shouldn't
refactor this so that the per-reader structs can be reused.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning