Mailing lists [pgsql-bugs]
- BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index nickr@mirth.com
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- BUG #10194: Stable function in select clause cann't be optimized to one call? digoal@126.com
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Nick Rupley
- Re: BUG #10194: Stable function in select clause cann't be optimized to one call? Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10194: Stable function in select clause cann't be optimized to one call? 德哥
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Nick Rupley
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- BUG #10201: Invalid input accepted with IN expression dbaston@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10201: Invalid input accepted with IN expression Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10201: Invalid input accepted with IN expression Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10201: Invalid input accepted with IN expression Daniel Baston
- BUG #10207: Simple select query returns duplicate row - Critical issue vetri_2020@yahoo.com
- Re: BUG #10207: Simple select query returns duplicate row - Critical issue Marko Tiikkaja
- Re: BUG #10207: Simple select query returns duplicate row - Critical issue Tom Lane
- BUG #10223: Linking postgresql 64 bit to sql server 64 bit soobia.arshad@tranchulas.com
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Alvaro Herrera
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Alvaro Herrera
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Nick Rupley
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Nick Rupley
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Jamie Koceniak
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index wayneh
- Re: Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- Re: Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Alvaro Herrera
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Heikki Linnakangas
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Devrim GÜNDÜZ
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Devrim GÜNDÜZ
- BUG #10235: Postgres is opening sathishp87@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index narupley__
- Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1 Alvaro Herrera
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Jamie Koceniak
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Heikki Linnakangas
- regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes Jeff Davis
- Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
- Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes Jeff Davis
- Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
- Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes Noah Misch
- can insert timestamp value that can't be read Jeff Davis
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Jamie Koceniak
- Re: can insert timestamp value that can't be read Tom Lane
- Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1 Rainer Tammer
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Andres Freund
- pg_ctl of postgres 8.4 doesn't behave the same than 9.x when using a custom unix socket path Cécile Tonglet
- Re: BUG #9635: Wal sender process is using 100% CPU Jamie Koceniak
- lost administrator privileges after postgres installation! Graham Johnson
- BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password dlo@isam.kiwi
- Re: pg_ctl of postgres 8.4 doesn't behave the same than 9.x when using a custom unix socket path Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password Stephen Frost
- BUG #10255: CREATE COLLATION bug on 9.4 emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10255: CREATE COLLATION bug on 9.4 Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10255: CREATE COLLATION bug on 9.4 Andres Freund
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Leif Jensen
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10255: CREATE COLLATION bug on 9.4 Emanuel Calvo
- Re: BUG #10255: CREATE COLLATION bug on 9.4 Tom Lane
- BUG #10256: COUNT(*) behaves sort of like RANK() when used over a window containing an ORDER BY arnaud.mouronval@gmail.com
- BUG #10254: Joined Constraints not invoked on date ranges christopher.hamel@zimmer.com
- Re: BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password Heikki Linnakangas
- Re: BUG #10256: COUNT(*) behaves sort of like RANK() when used over a window containing an ORDER BY Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10254: Joined Constraints not invoked on date ranges Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10255: CREATE COLLATION bug on 9.4 Emanuel Calvo
- Re: BUG #10256: COUNT(*) behaves sort of like RANK() when used over a window containing an ORDER BY David G Johnston
- Re: BUG #7914: pg_dump aborts occasionally Tom Lane
- Re: Re: BUG #10256: COUNT(*) behaves sort of like RANK() when used over a window containing an ORDER BY Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password Stephen Frost
- Re: Re: BUG #10256: COUNT(*) behaves sort of like RANK() when used over a window containing an ORDER BY David Johnston
- Re: Re: BUG #10256: COUNT(*) behaves sort of like RANK() when used over a window containing an ORDER BY Tom Lane
- Re: can insert timestamp value that can't be read Jeff Davis
- Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes Noah Misch
- Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password Dave Page
- Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password Akshay Joshi
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Leif Jensen
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Adrian Klaver
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Adrian Klaver
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Adrian Klaver
- Re: [GENERAL] Server process crash - Segmentation fault Leif Jensen
- Re: BUG #7914: pg_dump aborts occasionally Shin-ichi MORITA
- BUG #10273: Not Able To See Full Data vijay777pawar@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10273: Not Able To See Full Data Michael Paquier
- hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 Craig Ringer
- Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 Craig Ringer
- Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 Craig Ringer
- Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 Tom Lane
- BUG #10294: DROP DOMAIN IF EXISTS does not work as expected if schema does not exist also ales.kratochvil@t-mobile.cz
- Re: BUG #10294: DROP DOMAIN IF EXISTS does not work as expected if schema does not exist also Pavel Stehule
- Re: Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Burgess, Freddie
- Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 Craig Ringer
- Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 Tom Lane
- BUG #10297: yum - transaction check error sidharthdeshpande@gmail.com
- BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? tim.channell@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? David G Johnston
- Re: BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? Greg Stark
- Re: BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? Michael Paquier
- BUG #10316: Alter table rename fails if the "new name" starts with '_' parthibanp2@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? Tim Channell
- Re: BUG #10316: Alter table rename fails if the "new name" starts with '_' Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? David G Johnston
- BUG #10322: yum update fails on postgresql sidharthdeshpande@gmail.com
- Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: BUG #10250: pgAdmin III 1.16.1 stores unescaped plaintext password Akshay Joshi
- BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes olivier.macchioni@wingo.ch
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Olivier Macchioni
- BUG #10330: pg_ctl does not correctly honor "DETACHED_PROCESS" erica.stine@mailinator.com
- homebrew install bug Sean Story
- Re: BUG #10315: Transactions seem to be releasing locks early? Bruce Momjian
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Bruce Momjian
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10330: pg_ctl does not correctly honor "DETACHED_PROCESS" Bruce Momjian
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Olivier Macchioni
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes David G Johnston
- Re: homebrew install bug Tom Lane
- Re: homebrew install bug Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10330: pg_ctl does not correctly honor "DETACHED_PROCESS" Thomas Hruska
- Re: BUG #10330: pg_ctl does not correctly honor "DETACHED_PROCESS" Thomas Hruska
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Greg Stark
- Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
- Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
- Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Greg Stark
- Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
- Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Bruce Momjian
- Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes David G Johnston
- BUG #10338: could not read block hikkis21c@hotmail.com
- BUG #10334: Function regexp_split_to_array Error with '.' (comma) danilogarciamartins@hotmail.com
- Errors in Back File Venkateswara Rao U
- Re: BUG #10334: Function regexp_split_to_array Error with '.' (comma) Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10338: could not read block Michael Paquier
- BUG #10347: Can't write password to psql or pg_dump derek_ealy@rapid7.com
- Re: BUG #10347: Can't write password to psql or pg_dump hubert depesz lubaczewski
- Re: BUG #10347: Can't write password to psql or pg_dump Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10347: Can't write password to psql or pg_dump Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10338: could not read block seowoongkim
- BUG #10381: psql.exe and pg_dump.exe are wrong version thanhR@icanlearn.vn
- Re: BUG #10381: psql.exe and pg_dump.exe are wrong version Michael Paquier
- BUG #10404: auto_explain for EXPLAIN ANLYZE. katsumata.tomonari@po.ntts.co.jp
- Re: BUG #10404: auto_explain for EXPLAIN ANLYZE. Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index Andres Freund
- postgresql test failure with Python 3.4.0 in plpython_do Honza Horak
- BUG #10405: Sum not working with left join cousinka@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10381: psql.exe and pg_dump.exe are wrong version Jonathan (Thành)
- BUG #10408: yum repomd out of data for latest version of 9.2 s.c.nichols@sussex.ac.uk
- A bug of psql/ja.po Sawada Masahiko
- Re: BUG #10405: Sum not working with left join John R Pierce
- Re: BUG #10381: psql.exe and pg_dump.exe are wrong version Dave Page
- Re: BUG #10408: yum repomd out of data for latest version of 9.2 Devrim Gündüz
- Re: BUG #10404: auto_explain for EXPLAIN ANLYZE. Tomonari Katsumata
- Re: BUG #10404: auto_explain for EXPLAIN ANLYZE. Tomonari Katsumata
- Re: A bug of psql/ja.po Sawada Masahiko
- Problems with pgpool 3.3.3.1 and streaming replication in PostgreSQL 9.3.4 Burgess, Freddie
- Re: BUG #10405: Sum not working with left join rodriguez
- BUG #10429: the same update return different result chuisiniu@hotmail.com
- warning configuring postgres from source on OS X with uuid Edoardo Panfili
- Re: BUG #10429: the same update return different result rodriguez
- BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index m.sakrejda@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10429: the same update return different result Claudio Nieder
- Re: BUG #10429: the same update return different result Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #9818: LDAP Authentication subtree problem Magnus Hagander
- BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 lr@pcorp.us
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Andres Freund
- BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Paragon Corporation
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Paragon Corporation
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Paragon Corporation
- Re: BUG #10123: Weird entries in pg_stat_activity Maxim Boguk
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Tom Lane
- Postgres 9.3 command line displaying language Ariel Bello
- BUG #10446: start fails: data has group access eike@snafu.de
- Re: BUG #10436: Can't compile 9.4 with this mingw64-w32 gcc 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3 Paragon Corporation
- BUG #10437: Storing Password with a comma and/or colon in it fails use of psql, etc. michael@mce-business.de
- Re: BUG #10446: start fails: data has group access Tom Lane
- Re: Postgres 9.3 command line displaying language Jaime Casanova
- Re: BUG #10437: Storing Password with a comma and/or colon in it fails use of psql, etc. Vik Fearing
- ./configure failure under Mageia 4 x86_64 Graeme
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Heikki Linnakangas
- Re: postgresql test failure with Python 3.4.0 in plpython_do Honza Horak
- Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression yosxpe23
- pl/pgsql incorrect syntax checking on select .... into ... ? Artiom Makarov
- Re: BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max Keith Fiske
- Re: pl/pgsql incorrect syntax checking on select .... into ... ? Tom Lane
- BUG #10456: upgrade from 9.2.4 to 9.2.8 error william.dubois@recommind.com
- BUG #10457: Problem with double precision field. maxim.boguk@gmail.com
- Re: BUG #10457: Problem with double precision field. Tom Lane
- Re: BUG #10457: Problem with double precision field. Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Maciek Sakrejda
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Maciek Sakrejda
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Maciek Sakrejda
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Greg Stark
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Heikki Linnakangas
- pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund
- uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Sandro Santilli
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Alvaro Herrera
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Andres Freund
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Sandro Santilli
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Sandro Santilli
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Andres Freund
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Andres Freund
- Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index Greg Stark
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund
- Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian
- Re: BUG #10347: Can't write password to psql or pg_dump Noah Misch
- Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table Andres Freund