Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3
Date
Msg-id 53719A66.7000603@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 05/12/2014 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, I think we still have some other dependencies on assumed
> operator names in eg. CASE.  Cleaning up only NULLIF may not be a
> full solution.

GREATEST(..) and LEAST(..) already handle this, as does DISTINCT(...).

Is NULLIF different? Or are they doing something suspect, just
differently suspect?

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Burgess, Freddie"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #10189: Limit in 9.3.4 no longer works when ordering using a composite multi-type index
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: hstore dump/restore bug in 9.3