On 05/12/2014 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, I think we still have some other dependencies on assumed
> operator names in eg. CASE. Cleaning up only NULLIF may not be a
> full solution.
GREATEST(..) and LEAST(..) already handle this, as does DISTINCT(...).
Is NULLIF different? Or are they doing something suspect, just
differently suspect?
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services