Hi,
On 2014-05-30 16:31:50 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> The attached script shows a plpgsql function that enters
> an infinite loop which is not interrupted by statement_timeout.
> WARNING: concurrent delete in progress within table "crash9", xid is 4458893, self is 4458894/4458889
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "CREATE INDEX ON crash9 USING GIST ( the_geom)"
> PL/pgSQL function crash(regclass) line 148 at EXECUTE statement
I've attached a patch including an explanatory commit message. It
includes a regression test that fails with an endless loop on all
supported releases before the fix is applied.
Tom, Alvaro, All: Since it needs to fix HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() and
those routines are tricky I'd very much welcome a look over the
changes. As e.g. evidenced that exactly the buggy lines have been
whacked around repeatedly a long time ago.
Especially the slight behavioural change of HTSV deserves some review.
I do wonder if any of the other existing callers of HTSV are affected. I
don't understand predicate.c well enough to be sure, but it looks to me
like it'd could in theory lead to missed conflicts. Seems fairly
unlikely to matter in practice though.
I have to say I really hate the amount of repetitive code inside the
individual visibility routines. Obviously it's nothing backpatchable and
may become moot to a certain degree with the CSN work, but those are
pretty close to being unmaintainable.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
