Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 February 2005

00:35 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Tom Lane
06:43 Index Slowing Insert >50x Trevor Ball
06:43 Very important choice Lago, Bruno Almeida do
07:52 Re: Automagic tuning Jim C. Nasby
07:56 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Jim C. Nasby
08:06 Re: Automagic tuning Tom Lane
08:29 Re: Index Slowing Insert >50x Tom Lane
09:06 Re: Automagic tuning Jim C. Nasby
09:27 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
09:35 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
11:51 Re: Very important choice Richard Huxton
12:14 Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? PFC
13:01 Very important choice Bruno Almeida do Lago
14:27 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Jim C. Nasby
15:41 Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server Andrew Mayo
16:01 Re: Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server Shridhar Daithankar
16:19 Re: Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server Stef
16:34 Re: Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server PFC
16:58 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Alex Turner
18:31 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Merlin Moncure
21:55 Why the difference in query plan and performance pg 7.4.6? Joost Kraaijeveld
23:07 Re: Why the difference in query plan and performance pg John Arbash Meinel

2 February 2005

00:01 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
00:11 Re: Ideal disk setup for Postgresql 7.4? Bruce Momjian
00:11 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
03:16 horizontal partition Gaetano Mendola
07:25 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system William Yu
07:50 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Alex Turner
13:02 Accessing insert values in triggers Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan
18:56 Re: Swapping on Solaris Bruce Momjian
19:14 Re: Bitmap indexes Bruce Momjian
20:23 Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST tables Markus Schaber
20:37 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Bruce Momjian
20:44 Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST tables Tom Lane
21:19 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system William Yu
21:25 Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST Markus Schaber
21:35 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Bruce Momjian
21:53 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Merlin Moncure
21:55 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system William Yu
23:09 Re: horizontal partition Josh Berkus

3 February 2005

00:23 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
02:14 Re: Bitmap indexes Daniel Ceregatti
02:51 Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST Tom Lane
04:10 Re: horizontal partition Gaetano Mendola
06:16 Re: horizontal partition Josh Berkus
06:30 Re: horizontal partition Klint Gore
06:52 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Christopher Browne
07:55 GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos J. Yannikos
08:31 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Tom Lane
08:33 Effect of database encoding on performance Igor Postelnik
08:53 Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? Sean Davis
09:42 Re: horizontal partition Josh Berkus
09:55 Re: horizontal partition Tom Lane
11:02 Re: Accessing insert values in triggers Michael Fuhr
12:30 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Christopher Kings-Lynne
12:52 Tunning postgresql on linux (fedora core 3) Din Adrian
12:58 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Oleg Bartunov
13:30 Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST Markus Schaber
13:40 Re: horizontal partition Gaetano Mendola
13:54 Re: Tunning postgresql on linux (fedora core 3) Richard Huxton
14:04 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos J. Yannikos
14:11 Planner really hates nested loops David Brown
15:08 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) PFC
15:16 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Oleg Bartunov
16:16 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos J. Yannikos
16:57 Re: Tunning postgresql on linux (fedora core 3) Richard Huxton
16:59 Re: [postgis-users] Bad query optimizer misestimation because of Markus Schaber
17:52 Re: Tunning postgresql on linux (fedora core 3) Richard Huxton
19:25 Re: Planner really hates nested loops Tom Lane
19:27 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Tom Lane
19:42 Re: Planner really hates nested loops Magnus Hagander
20:10 Re: Planner really hates nested loops Merlin Moncure
22:09 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos J. Yannikos
22:51 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Oleg Bartunov

4 February 2005

02:24 Re: Planner really hates nested loops David Brown
07:40 Re: Planner really hates nested loops Bruce Momjian
20:48 Re: Flattening a kind of 'dynamic' table Merlin Moncure
23:09 Re: Flattening a kind of 'dynamic' table Alexandre Leclerc

5 February 2005

16:02 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos Yannikos
21:21 query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk Lutzebaeck
22:01 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Tom Lane
22:26 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file John A Meinel
22:42 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Tom Lane

6 February 2005

01:10 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Greg Stark
01:43 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Tom Lane
01:50 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Greg Stark
02:01 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Tom Lane
18:19 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file John A Meinel
18:53 Re: horizontal partition Gaetano Mendola
18:58 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Greg Stark
19:43 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Jan Wieck
19:46 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file John A Meinel
20:16 Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Steven Rosenstein
20:17 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Tom Lane
20:39 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Gaetano Mendola
20:51 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Michael Fuhr
20:59 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM John Arbash Meinel
22:33 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Steven Rosenstein
22:50 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Tom Lane
22:51 Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? Steven Rosenstein

7 February 2005

00:57 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Steven Rosenstein
01:10 Re: Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? Leeuw van der, Tim
01:35 Re: Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? Greg Stark
01:46 Re: Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? Tom Lane
02:06 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Jan Wieck
05:44 Re: Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? Steven Rosenstein
12:07 Index not used with or condition Antony Paul
14:14 Re: Index not used with or condition Antony Paul
14:36 Is this possible / slow performance? Joost Kraaijeveld
14:46 Re: Index not used with or condition Steinar H. Gunderson
14:54 Re: Index not used with or condition Jan Poslusny
14:57 Re: Index not used with or condition Antony Paul
14:58 Re: Index not used with or condition Antony Paul
17:08 Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST Markus Schaber
17:39 Re: Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? Markus Schaber
19:38 Retry: Is this possible / slow performance? Joost Kraaijeveld
20:04 Re: Retry: Is this possible / slow performance? Tom Lane
20:26 Re: Are JOINs allowed with DELETE FROM Gaetano Mendola
21:13 Re: Retry: Is this possible / slow performance? PFC
22:27 Re: Retry: Is this possible / slow performance? Joost Kraaijeveld
22:53 Re: Retry: Is this possible / slow performance? Merlin Moncure

8 February 2005

01:25 Solaris 9 tuning Paul Johnson
05:25 Re: Solaris 9 tuning Josh Berkus
21:24 Slow Restoration of a template1 Database (ALTER GROUP) Ben Young
21:58 Re: Slow Restoration of a template1 Database (ALTER GROUP) Tom Lane
22:59 Re: Slow Restoration of a template1 Database (ALTER GROUP) Tom Lane
23:09 Re: Slow Restoration of a template1 Database (ALTER GROUP) Ben Young
23:32 Re: Slow Restoration of a template1 Database (ALTER GROUP) Tom Lane

9 February 2005

08:53 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk.Lutzebaeck@t-online.de (Dirk Lutzebaeck)
08:56 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk.Lutzebaeck@t-online.de (Dirk Lutzebaeck)
08:59 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk.Lutzebaeck@t-online.de (Dirk Lutzebaeck)
09:03 Postgres odbc performance on windows Sanketh Indarapu
09:05 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk.Lutzebaeck@t-online.de (Dirk Lutzebaeck)
09:07 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk.Lutzebaeck@t-online.de (Dirk Lutzebaeck)
09:09 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk.Lutzebaeck@t-online.de (Dirk Lutzebaeck)
12:16 Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Christopher Kings-Lynne
17:26 How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor machine Alex
17:49 Re: How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor John A Meinel
18:00 Re: How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor Alex
18:14 Re: How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor Merlin Moncure
18:16 Re: How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor John A Meinel
18:58 Tell postgres which index to use? Silke Trissl
20:43 Re: Tell postgres which index to use? Josh Berkus
20:58 Re: Tell postgres which index to use? Silke Trissl
21:37 Re: Tell postgres which index to use? John Arbash Meinel
22:03 Re: Solaris 9 tuning Paul Johnson
22:25 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos J. Yannikos
22:33 Re: Solaris 9 tuning Tom Arthurs
23:01 Performance Tuning Chris Kratz
23:38 Re: Performance Tuning John Arbash Meinel
23:50 Re: Solaris 9 tuning Paul Johnson
23:50 Re: Tell postgres which index to use? Greg Stark

10 February 2005

00:00 Re: Performance Tuning Greg Stark
00:25 Re: Performance Tuning Chris Kratz
00:46 annotated PostgreSQL.conf now up Josh Berkus
01:08 Re: Performance Tuning Merlin Moncure
01:09 Re: Solaris 9 tuning Tom Arthurs
01:15 Re: Performance Tuning Chris Kratz
01:18 Re: Performance Tuning Chris Kratz
01:30 Re: Performance Tuning Chris Kratz
02:59 Re: Performance Tuning PFC
03:56 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Marinos J. Yannikos
04:14 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2) Neil Conway
04:27 Re: Performance Tuning Mike Rylander
04:48 Re: How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor Iain
06:35 Re: Performance Tuning PFC
06:50 Re: Performance Tuning Christopher Browne
08:42 Re: Performance Tuning Rod Taylor
08:45 Re: Solaris 9 tuning Tom Arthurs
08:49 Benchmark Jaime Casanova
16:18 Re: How can I make use of both CPUs in a dual processor Alex
16:19 Re: Benchmark Jeff
21:34 Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run Chris Kratz
21:58 Re: Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run Tom Lane
22:06 Re: Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run Chris Kratz
23:10 Re: Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run Darcy Buskermolen
23:25 Re: Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run Chris Kratz

11 February 2005

08:22 Re: Benchmark Mitch Pirtle
09:38 Re: Benchmark Tom Lane
10:04 Re: Benchmark Mitch Pirtle
10:22 Re: Benchmark Jaime Casanova
12:19 How to interpret this explain analyse? Joost Kraaijeveld
13:20 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Richard Huxton
15:54 Re: Benchmark Bruno Wolff III
16:16 Re: Benchmark Richard Huxton
16:17 Re: Benchmark Jeff
18:04 Re: Benchmark Greg Stark
19:18 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Tom Lane
21:09 Re: Benchmark Mike Benoit
21:19 Re: Benchmark (slightly off topic but oh well) PFC
21:29 Re: Benchmark PFC
21:41 Re: Benchmark Tom Lane
22:25 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Joost Kraaijeveld
22:41 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Tom Lane
23:42 Re: Benchmark Merlin Moncure

12 February 2005

02:12 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Joost Kraaijeveld

13 February 2005

04:34 Re: Benchmark Christopher Browne
12:13 Re: Benchmark Ron Mayer
19:35 Re: Benchmark Greg Stark
22:25 Re: Benchmark Patrick Meylemans

14 February 2005

00:27 estimated rows vs. actual rows Jaime Casanova
00:42 Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Josh Berkus
06:19 Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Jaime Casanova
06:38 Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Tom Lane
06:41 Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Mark Kirkwood
11:01 Autocommit Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan
11:47 Re: Autocommit Michael Fuhr
11:59 Re: Autocommit Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan
12:34 Re: Autocommit Michael Fuhr
13:47 Re: Benchmark Harald Fuchs
15:48 Re: estimated rows vs. actual rows Christopher Browne
22:57 String matching Ivan Voras
23:05 Re: String matching PFC
23:32 Re: String matching Ivan Voras
23:42 Re: String matching Stephan Szabo
23:45 Re: String matching Ivan Voras

15 February 2005

01:13 Re: String matching Stephan Szabo
01:29 Re: String matching Ivan Voras
01:32 Re: String matching Stephan Szabo
02:35 seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Mark Aufflick
03:11 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Kevin Brown
04:30 VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Michael Ryan S. Puncia
04:53 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain
05:07 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Michael Ryan S. Puncia
05:23 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Rod Taylor
05:30 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain
06:52 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Iain
07:21 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Rod Taylor
08:32 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Tom Lane
08:50 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Christopher Browne
08:55 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM Iain
09:52 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Iain
10:07 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark
10:36 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane
10:40 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Greg Stark
11:11 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark
11:47 Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM PFC
17:48 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure
18:12 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Bricklen Anderson
20:23 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Josh Berkus
20:55 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane
21:04 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure
21:40 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark
21:41 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Magnus Hagander
23:16 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Christopher Browne

16 February 2005

00:51 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown PFC
07:20 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Greg Stark
22:02 disagreeing query planners lcham02

17 February 2005

00:10 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? Kevin Brown
06:14 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Ron Mayer
16:29 PG proper configuation for a php forum JM

18 February 2005

01:24 VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query werner fraga
01:38 Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query John Arbash Meinel
02:28 Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query Tom Lane
13:15 Effects of IDLE processes JM
16:56 Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno
17:09 Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Steinar H. Gunderson
17:16 Re: Effects of IDLE processes Tom Lane
17:32 Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Tom Lane
17:40 Re: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Steinar H. Gunderson
17:45 RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno
17:53 Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Christopher Kings-Lynne
17:54 Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Christopher Kings-Lynne
17:59 Re: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Tom Lane
18:11 Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Merlin Moncure
18:12 RES: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno

19 February 2005

02:25 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Gaetano Mendola
02:27 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Gaetano Mendola
07:11 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Bruce Momjian

20 February 2005

15:04 RES: RES: Degradation of postgres 7.4.5 on FreeBSD/CygWin Rodrigo Moreno
15:25 bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola
18:46 Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit@health2.moph.go.th
21:25 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Magnus Hagander
21:46 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane

21 February 2005

01:58 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood
03:46 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola
03:51 Re: Effects of IDLE processes Gaetano Mendola
04:30 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Klint Gore
04:33 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit@health2.moph.go.th
05:03 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane
06:04 Re: bad performances using hashjoin David Brown
06:54 Re: Effects of IDLE processes Christopher Browne
06:55 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Tom Lane
14:18 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Gaetano Mendola
14:25 Re: Effects of IDLE processes Gaetano Mendola
17:03 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Merlin Moncure
17:03 Re: bad performances using hashjoin David Brown
19:27 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Tom Lane
20:11 Re: bad performances using hashjoin Mischa

22 February 2005

00:16 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood
00:51 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood
04:05 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown Ron Mayer
07:59 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit@health2.moph.go.th
08:45 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood
18:01 PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2)
18:34 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit@health2.moph.go.th
19:30 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Mitch Pirtle
21:18 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander
22:48 is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola
23:07 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood
23:56 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor

23 February 2005

00:28 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Tom Lane
02:08 Re: VACUUM ANALYZE slows down query Tom Lane
04:06 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola
04:06 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola
08:00 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Neil Conway
09:06 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Christopher Browne
09:06 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Christopher Browne
09:17 Joins, Deletes and Indexes Butkus_Charles@emc.com
09:23 Inefficient Query Plans Luke Chambers
09:28 PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2)
09:34 subquery vs join on 7.4.5 David Haas
09:39 Help me please ! Asatryan, Anahit
09:45 join vs. subquery David Haas
11:29 Re: Help me please ! Richard Huxton
11:40 Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Richard Huxton
13:41 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2)
16:06 Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Butkus_Charles@emc.com
16:42 Re: Joins, Deletes and Indexes Richard Huxton
17:38 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Markus Schaber
17:42 Re: Help me please ! Markus Schaber
17:50 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander
17:55 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Magnus Hagander
17:55 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function amrit@health2.moph.go.th
19:31 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola
19:39 Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood
19:44 Re: Inefficient Query Plans Tom Lane
19:55 Re: subquery vs join on 7.4.5 Tom Lane
20:50 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function G u i d o B a r o s i o
21:03 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Michael Adler
21:25 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Bruno Almeida do Lago
21:36 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Rod Taylor
21:37 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Tom Lane
21:51 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Tom Lane
22:16 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood
22:16 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor
22:46 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel
22:51 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Michael Adler
23:05 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood
23:25 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel
23:30 Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function Mark Kirkwood
23:42 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood
23:58 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Josh Berkus

24 February 2005

00:02 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel
01:36 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Neil Conway
01:56 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Tom Lane
06:50 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Christopher Browne
11:28 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2)
13:59 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola
15:13 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber
16:27 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Bruno Almeida do Lago
21:31 Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Allgood
22:08 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Joel Fradkin
22:40 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout John Arbash Meinel

25 February 2005

00:25 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Bruce Momjian
08:02 Re: PostgreSQL is extremely slow on Windows Greg Stark
10:41 gah! sudden slowdown?? SpaceBallOne
13:10 IS NULL vs IS NOT NULL Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2)
14:19 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Vig, Sandor (G/FI-2)
14:19 Re: gah! sudden slowdown?? Steinar H. Gunderson
16:47 Possible interesting extra information for explain analyze? Jeff
17:55 Re: IS NULL vs IS NOT NULL Stephan Szabo
19:04 Re: Possible interesting extra information for explain analyze? Tom Lane
19:19 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Jim C. Nasby
20:54 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber

28 February 2005

14:31 PostgreSQL 7.4.3 Performance issues on OpenBSD Glenn Kusardi
15:05 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola
16:11 PG block sizes Tom Arthurs
20:07 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Markus Schaber
20:18 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Matthew T. O'Connor
20:54 Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout Markus Schaber
21:03 Re: Possible interesting extra information for explain Simon Riggs
21:22 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Bruno Wolff III