Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruno Almeida do Lago
Subject Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout
Date
Msg-id 421dd635.7b3d0b0f.1e05.1618@smtp.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
No problems my friend :P

I thought that since the beginning and just sent the e-mail to confirm if
there was no software limitation.


Best Wishes,
Bruno Almeida do Lago




-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:02 PM
To: Bruno Almeida do Lago
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout

Bruno,

> For example, 150 active connections on a medium-end
> 32-bit Linux server will consume significant system resources, and 600 is
> about the limit."

That, is, "is about the limit for a medium-end 32-bit Linux server".
Sorry
if the implication didn't translate well.   If you use beefier hardware, of
course, you can manage more connections; personally I've never needed more
than 1000, even on a web site that gets 100,000 d.u.v.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Markus Schaber
Date:
Subject: Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Next
From: John Allgood
Date:
Subject: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout