Re: Solaris 9 tuning - Mailing list pgsql-performance

... Trying again again with right email address -- list server rejected previous :)

Hi, Paul

Josh helped my company with this issue -- PG doesn't use shared memory like Oracle, it depends more on the OS buffers.
Makingshared mem 
too large a fraction is disasterous and seriously impact performance. (though I find myself having to justify this to
Oracletrained 
DBA's) :)

What I found was the biggest performance improvement on the write side was to turn of file system journaling, and on
theread side was 
to feed postgres as many CPU's as you can.  What we found for a high use db (for example backending a web site) is that
8-400g cpu's 
outperforms 2 or 4 fast cpus.  The fast cpu's spend all of their time context switching as more connections are made.

Also make sure your txlog is on another spindle -- it might even be worth taking one out of the stripe to do this.

I am running solaris 9 on an e3500 also (though my disc setup is different)

Here's what I have things set to -- it's probably a pretty good starting point for you:

# - Memory -

shared_buffers = 65536          # min 16, at least max_connections*2, 8KB each
sort_mem = 12000                # min 64, size in KB
vacuum_mem = 64000              # min 1024, size in KB

# - Free Space Map -

max_fsm_pages = 100000          # min max_fsm_relations*16, 6 bytes each
#max_fsm_relations = 10000      # min 100, ~50 bytes each

# - Kernel Resource Usage -

#max_files_per_process = 1000   # min 25
#preload_libraries = ''

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and the tail end of /etc/system:

* shared memory config for postgres
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=0xFFFFFFFF
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=256
set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=256
set semsys:seminfo_semmap=256
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=512
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=1000
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=512
* end of shared memory setting
* Set the hme card to force 100 full duplex and not to autonegotiate
* since hme does not play well with cisco
*
set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap=1
set hme:hme_adv_100hdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_10fdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_10hdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_100T4_cap=0


Paul Johnson wrote:

> Hi Josh, there are 8 internal disks - all are 18GB@10,000 RPM, fibre
> connected.
>
> The O/S is on 2 mirrored disks, the Postgres cluster is on the /data1
> filesystem that is striped across the other 6 disks.
>
> The shared_buffers value is a semi-educated guess based on having made 4GB
> shared memory available via /etc/system, and having read all we could find
> on various web sites.
>
> Should I knock it down to 400MB as you suggest?
>
> I'll check out that URL.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
>
>>Paul,
>>
>>>I would like to know what /etc/system and postgresql_conf values are
>
> recommended to deliver as much system resource as possible to Postgres.
> We
>
>>>use this Sun box solely for single user Postgres data warehousing
>
> workloads.
>
>>What's your disk system?
>>
>>>shared_buffers = 500000
>>
>>This is highly unlikely to be optimal.   That's 3GB.   On test linux
>
> systems
>
>>up to 8GB, we've not seen useful values of shared buffers anywhere above
>
> 400mb.    How did you arrive at that figure?
>
>>>sort_mem = 2097152
>>>vacuum_mem = 1000000
>>
>>These could be fine on a single-user system.   sort_mem is per *sort*
>
> though,
>
>>not per query, so you'd need to watch out for complex queries spillling
>
> into
>
>>swap; perhaps set it a 0.5GB or 1GB?
>>Otherwise, start with the config guide at
>
> www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList
>
>>--
>>Josh Berkus
>>Aglio Database Solutions
>>San Francisco
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
>