Re: bad performances using hashjoin - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mischa
Subject Re: bad performances using hashjoin
Date
Msg-id 1109005894.421a16469b1c5@webmail.telus.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad performances using hashjoin  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Quoting Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:

> Klint Gore <kg@kgb.une.edu.au> writes:
> > Is having an order by in a view legal?
>
> Not according to the SQL spec, but PG has allowed it for several releases.
> (The same goes for ORDER BY in a sub-select, which is actually pretty
> much the same thing ...)

Umm... if you implement LIMIT in a subselect, it becomes highly meaningful (nad
useful.

Is this a case of one nonstandard feature being the thin edge of the wedge
for another?
--
"Dreams come true, not free."


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with 7.4.5 and webmin 1.8 in grant function