Re: bad performances using hashjoin - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Brown
Subject Re: bad performances using hashjoin
Date
Msg-id 4219EA17.8090906@bigpond.net.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad performances using hashjoin  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Gaetano Mendola wrote:

>I think is due the fact that first queries were performed in peakhours.
>
>
A memory intensive operation takes 7.5 times longer during heavy loads.
Doesn't this suggest that swapping of working memory is occurring?


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown