Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Date
Msg-id 42233CDA.3030407@logi-track.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to is pg_autovacuum so effective ?  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi, Matthew,

Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb:

> The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be
> instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut.  Aside from moved out
> of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum
> settings is probably the next highest priority.

What was the reason for non-acceptance?

Is it available as a standalone project?


Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Arthurs
Date:
Subject: PG block sizes
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?