Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: How to interpret this explain analyse?
Date
Msg-id 877jla47he.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How to interpret this explain analyse?  (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>)
Responses Re: How to interpret this explain analyse?  (Bricklen Anderson <BAnderson@PresiNET.com>)
Re: How to interpret this explain analyse?  (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com> writes:

> Ouch.  Is this really a reasonable assumption?  I figured the primary
> use of a cursor was to fetch small amounts of data at a time from a
> large table, so 10% seems extremely high as an average fetch size.  Or
> is the optimization based on the number of rows that will be fetched
> by the cursor during the cursor's lifetime (as opposed to in a single
> fetch)?
>
> Also, one has to ask what the consequences are of assuming a value too
> low versus too high.  Which ends up being worse?

This is one of the things the planner really cannot know. Ultimately it's the
kind of thing for which hints really are necessary. Oracle distinguishes
between the "minimize total time" versus "minimize startup time" with
/*+ ALL_ROWS */ and /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ hints, for example.

I would also find it reasonable to have hints to specify a selectivity for
expressions the optimizer has no hope of possibly being able to estimate.
Things like "WHERE myfunction(col1,col2,?) /*+ 10% */"


--
greg

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown