Josh Berkus wrote:
> Gaetano,
>
>
>>I did in that way just to not use postgresql specific feature.
>>I can give it a try and I let you know, however the question remain,
>>why the index usage is lost if used in that way ?
>
>
> Because PostgreSQL is materializing the entire UNION data set in the
> subselect. What Postgres version are you using? I thought this was fixed
> in 7.4, but maybe not ...
>
Yes, I'm using with 7.4.x, so it was not fixed...
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
