Re: Benchmark - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Patrick Meylemans
Subject Re: Benchmark
Date
Msg-id 5.2.1.1.0.20050213202121.029592b8@server04.site04.wtcm.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Benchmark  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-performance
Dear,

We are using PostgreSQL for 4 Years now, one can say it is a blessing to maintain. Our previous database was number one (;-), it was much harder to maintain so labor is a pro for PostgreSQL ...

Kind Regards

Patrick Meylemans

IT Manager
WTCM-CRIF
Celestijnenlaan 300C
3001 Helerlee


At 11:34 13/02/2005 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:

> After all, the cost of a computer system to run the transactions is
> likely to be comprised of some combination of software licenses and
> hardware costs.  Even if the software is free, the hardware isn't.

And labour costs.

--
greg


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Benchmark
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: estimated rows vs. actual rows