Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 March 2004

06:30 Re: FreeBSD config Mark Kirkwood
06:40 Re: FreeBSD config Dror Matalon
07:18 Re: FreeBSD config Mark Kirkwood
13:35 Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9 Andrew Sullivan
15:31 Scaling further up Anjan Dave
15:41 Re: Slow query scott.marlowe
16:30 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Rob Fielding
19:54 Re: Scaling further up Magnus Hagander
20:57 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave
23:28 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Simon Riggs

2 March 2004

00:01 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Tom Lane
00:06 Re: Select-Insert-Query postgres@countup.de
00:10 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Josh Berkus
00:13 Re: Scaling further up Josh Berkus
02:21 Re: Scaling further up Christopher Browne
10:48 Re: Select-Insert-Query Oliver Elphick
16:50 Re: Scaling further up William Yu
17:57 Re: Scaling further up Fred Moyer
19:26 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave
19:45 Re: FreeBSD config Vivek Khera
19:51 Re: Database Server Tuning Vivek Khera
20:17 Re: Scaling further up Chris Ruprecht
20:27 Re: Scaling further up Josh Berkus
20:28 Re: Database Server Tuning Josh Berkus
20:30 Re: Scaling further up scott.marlowe
20:32 Re: Database Server Tuning Vivek Khera
21:16 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Simon Riggs
21:16 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Simon Riggs
21:35 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave
21:35 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave
21:49 Re: Scaling further up scott.marlowe
21:56 Re: Scaling further up Rod Taylor
22:05 Re: Scaling further up johnnnnnn
23:01 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Neil Conway
23:11 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave

3 March 2004

01:06 Re: Scaling further up Jeff
01:27 Re: Scaling further up Rod Taylor
07:57 Re: Scaling further up Paul Thomas
08:25 Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 Florian Weimer
10:32 Re: Scaling further up Andrew Sullivan
13:10 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 Florian Weimer
19:46 Re: Database Server Tuning Josh Berkus
19:46 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Josh Berkus
19:47 Re: Scaling further up Josh Berkus
19:51 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 Vivek Khera
20:40 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 Vivek Khera
20:54 Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes John Siracusa
20:58 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 Greg Spiegelberg
20:58 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Simon Riggs
21:11 Re: Scaling further up scott.marlowe
22:44 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Neil Conway
22:47 Re: [HACKERS] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Tom Lane
22:50 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Neil Conway
22:53 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes Tom Lane
23:52 Re: Scaling further up Paul Thomas

4 March 2004

00:26 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes Christopher Kings-Lynne
09:06 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 Florian Weimer
15:40 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave
16:25 Re: Scaling further up scott.marlowe

5 March 2004

12:35 Fixed width rows faster? Jeff
13:07 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Bill Moran
13:31 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Dennis Bjorklund
22:29 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Josh Berkus
22:37 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Josh Berkus
22:43 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan
22:54 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Rod Taylor

6 March 2004

03:21 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:32 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan
04:42 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Tom Lane
04:53 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Tom Lane
09:02 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Christopher Kings-Lynne
12:17 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Eric Jain
15:27 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Andrew Sullivan
19:51 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes John Siracusa
19:52 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Tom Lane
20:06 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes Tom Lane
20:55 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes John Siracusa

7 March 2004

00:16 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan
00:21 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Rod Taylor
00:32 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Neil Conway
01:26 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan
01:29 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes John Siracusa
01:39 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes Larry Rosenman
02:00 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Rod Taylor
02:47 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes Tom Lane
10:42 speeding up a select with C function? David Teran
12:42 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Dennis Bjorklund
13:49 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Andrew Sullivan
14:02 Re: speeding up a select with C function? Rod Taylor
23:27 Using bigint needs explicit cast to use the index Steven Butler
23:44 Re: Using bigint needs explicit cast to use the index Neil Conway

8 March 2004

00:25 Re: speeding up a select with C function? Christopher Kings-Lynne
05:22 Re: speeding up a select with C function? Dennis Bjorklund
05:57 simple query join Chris Smith
06:12 Re: simple query join Steven Butler
06:47 Re: simple query join Dennis Bjorklund
08:39 Re: Fixed width rows faster? Eric Jain
15:05 Re: Using bigint needs explicit cast to use the index Andrew Sullivan
15:23 Re: Using bigint needs explicit cast to use the index Neil Conway
15:30 Re: Using bigint needs explicit cast to use the index Bruno Wolff III
15:46 Re: Using bigint needs explicit cast to use the index Andrew Sullivan
15:52 Re: Scaling further up William Yu
16:55 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes Bruce Momjian
20:43 Re: simple query join Chris Smith

9 March 2004

08:54 Re: speeding up a select with C function? David Teran
11:02 Re: speeding up a select with C function? David Teran
13:46 Re: speeding up a select with C function? Christopher Kings-Lynne
14:37 Re: speeding up a select with C function? Tom Lane
19:18 Cluster and vacuum performance Shea,Dan [CIS]
19:27 Re: [HACKERS] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage Simon Riggs
19:29 syslog slowing the database? Greg Spiegelberg
20:57 Re: syslog slowing the database? Richard Huxton
21:28 Re: Cluster and vacuum performance Josh Berkus
22:20 Re: Scaling further up Aaron W
22:25 Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes CoL
22:35 Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9 teknokrat
22:47 Delete performance on delete from table with inherited tables Chris Kratz
23:46 Re: Delete performance on delete from table with inherited Stephan Szabo
23:50 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Tom Lane

10 March 2004

00:09 Re: Delete performance on delete from table with inherited tables Tom Lane
00:18 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Gavin M. Roy
00:31 Re: Cluster and vacuum performance Tom Lane
00:46 Re: Cluster and vacuum performance Tom Lane
01:44 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Stephen Robert Norris
02:35 optimizing large query with IN (...) Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes
07:13 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Eric Jain
07:32 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Christopher Kings-Lynne
12:56 Cluster failure due to space Shea,Dan [CIS]
13:50 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Steve Atkins
14:28 Re: Cluster failure due to space Tom Lane
14:41 Re: Cluster failure due to space Shea,Dan [CIS]
15:10 Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9 Andrew Sullivan
16:06 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Greg Spiegelberg
16:09 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes
16:55 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) scott.marlowe
17:02 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Tom Lane
17:03 Re: Cluster and vacuum performance Josh Berkus
17:06 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Steve Atkins
17:17 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) scott.marlowe
18:12 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Mark Harrison
20:09 Re: syslog slowing the database? Vivek Khera
22:21 Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9 Jeff

11 March 2004

00:28 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:38 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Chris Smith
01:01 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Bruno Wolff III
03:10 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Tom Lane
13:00 started Data Warehousing Pablo Marrero
13:54 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Joshua D. Drake
13:55 Re: started Data Warehousing Joshua D. Drake
14:09 Re: started Data Warehousing brew@theMode.com
17:26 Impact of varchar/text in use of indexes Mike Moran
17:29 Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9 Andrew Sullivan
18:02 Re: Impact of varchar/text in use of indexes Tom Lane

12 March 2004

00:47 severe performance issue with planner Eric Brown
01:37 Re: severe performance issue with planner Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:08 Re: severe performance issue with planner Tom Lane
04:41 Sorting when LEFT JOINING to 2 same tables, even aliased. Octavio Alvarez
05:09 Re: Sorting when LEFT JOINING to 2 same tables, even Stephan Szabo
16:40 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Josh Berkus
17:00 Re: severe performance issue with planner Greg Stark
17:15 Re: severe performance issue with planner Greg Stark
18:18 pg_xlog on same drive as OS mallah@trade-india.com
19:03 Re: pg_xlog on same drive as OS Josh Berkus
20:52 Re: pg_xlog on same drive as OS Christopher Browne
22:02 Re: Scaling further up Robert Treat
22:25 Re: Scaling further up Anjan Dave

13 March 2004

00:42 rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
01:51 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Marty Scholes
03:03 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Tom Lane
14:39 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Tom Lane
14:55 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
15:07 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
15:11 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
15:52 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Josh Berkus
16:31 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Matthew T. O'Connor
18:53 Re: optimizing large query with IN (...) Joseph Shraibman
18:56 Re: Postgresql on SAN Joseph Shraibman
18:59 Re: Scaling further up Marty Scholes
18:59 Drop Tables Very Slow in Postgresql 7.2.1 Maneesha Nunes
19:01 High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks Mike Bridge
19:05 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Magnus Naeslund(t)
22:17 Re: High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks Tom Lane

14 March 2004

02:47 Re: severe performance issue with planner Kris Jurka
14:52 Re: Drop Tables Very Slow in Postgresql 7.2.1 Andrew Sullivan
15:00 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Andrew Sullivan
18:33 Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Arjen van der Meijden
20:09 Re: Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Tom Lane
21:10 Re: Scaling further up Aaron Werman
22:10 Deadlocks... postgres@countup.de
22:21 Re: Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Arjen van der Meijden

15 March 2004

14:21 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? scott.marlowe
14:38 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? Bruce Momjian
15:01 Re: [ADMIN] syslog slowing the database? scott.marlowe
16:15 Re: Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Greg Stark
16:20 Re: Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Greg Stark
17:55 Re: Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Arjen van der Meijden
19:09 Re: Scaling further up Andrew Sullivan
19:29 atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
19:30 Re: Scaling further up Matt Davies
19:40 Re: High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks Mike Bridge
19:40 Re: Large CASE-statement is pretty slow? Tom Lane
19:59 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Matthew T. O'Connor
20:06 Re: atrocious update performance Rod Taylor
20:16 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
20:29 Re: atrocious update performance Aaron Werman
20:47 Re: High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks Tom Lane
20:53 Re: atrocious update performance Rod Taylor
21:51 Re: Scaling further up Stephen Robert Norris
22:20 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
23:08 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane

16 March 2004

01:42 Re: atrocious update performance Aaron Werman
04:00 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
04:25 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Tom Lane
04:32 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Matthew T. O'Connor
04:39 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
04:49 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
06:31 Re: atrocious update performance Greg Stark
06:39 Re: atrocious update performance Shridhar Daithankar
14:25 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
16:33 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
17:04 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
17:54 Fwd: Configuring disk cache size on postgress Darcy Buskermolen
18:58 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
19:14 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
21:18 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
21:29 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
23:20 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz

17 March 2004

00:22 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
02:25 Re: atrocious update performance Aaron Werman
03:50 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
04:14 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Matthew T. O'Connor
04:17 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Tom Lane
04:20 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
06:33 Re: severe performance issue with planner (fwd) Kris Jurka
06:46 A good article about application tuning Shridhar Daithankar
08:11 Re: atrocious update performance Richard Huxton
14:16 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
14:40 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Arthur Ward
16:35 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
16:59 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
17:18 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Andrew Sullivan
17:42 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
18:21 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
18:40 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Joe Conway
18:48 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
19:34 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
19:43 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
19:52 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
19:57 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart Matthew T. O'Connor
22:49 PostgreSQL Disk Usage and Page Size Seum-Lim Gan
23:08 Re: PostgreSQL Disk Usage and Page Size Stephen Robert Norris
23:18 Re: PostgreSQL Disk Usage and Page Size Stephan Szabo

18 March 2004

04:03 Re: severe performance issue with planner (fwd) Tom Lane
15:56 Re: PostgreSQL Disk Usage and Page Size Stephan Szabo
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
16:46 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
16:58 Re: PostgreSQL Disk Usage and Page Size Stephan Szabo
17:44 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
18:00 string casting for index usage Michael Adler
18:07 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
18:22 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
18:28 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
18:55 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
19:09 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
19:09 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
19:20 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
19:34 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
19:39 Re: string casting for index usage Tom Lane
19:40 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Josh Berkus
19:56 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
20:01 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
20:05 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
23:41 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Kevin Brown

19 March 2004

00:34 Re: severe performance issue with planner (fwd) Eric Brown
00:59 Re: severe performance issue with planner (fwd) Eric Brown
03:08 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
03:23 vacuum performance Alan Stange
05:18 Re: vacuum performance Tom Lane
22:29 Re: string casting for index usage Tom Lane
23:17 Re: string casting for index usage Michael Adler

20 March 2004

02:48 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Kevin Brown

22 March 2004

13:08 Re: atrocious update performance Greg Spiegelberg
14:12 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Kurt Roeckx
14:14 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Kurt Roeckx
14:17 two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed together Joseph Shraibman
14:19 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Kurt Roeckx
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Kurt Roeckx
15:55 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed together Richard Huxton
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking markw@osdl.org
16:41 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Tom Lane
16:42 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
16:55 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed together Joseph Shraibman
17:24 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed together Tom Lane
18:00 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed together Joseph Shraibman
18:32 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed Stephan Szabo
18:40 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed together Joseph Shraibman
19:44 Re: two seperate queries run faster than queries ORed Tom Lane
20:30 Databases Vs. Schemas Subbiah, Stalin
21:09 Re: [ADMIN] Databases Vs. Schemas Tom Lane
23:05 Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Subbiah, Stalin

23 March 2004

00:30 Re: severe performance issue with planner Eric Brown
04:20 Re: Databases Vs. Schemas Josh Berkus
04:20 Re: Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Josh Berkus
04:38 Re: Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Mark Kirkwood
13:12 Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Phil Endecott
13:50 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Stephan Szabo
14:14 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Stephan Szabo
14:48 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Tom Lane
15:10 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
15:41 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Phil Endecott
15:55 Re: Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Josh Berkus
16:04 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Bruno Wolff III
16:18 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Josh Berkus
16:21 Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions Tom Lane
16:36 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Andrew Sullivan
17:17 Re: [ADMIN] Databases Vs. Schemas Subbiah, Stalin
17:40 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Subbiah, Stalin
17:49 Help with query plan inconsistencies Woody Woodring
17:51 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Matt Clark
17:57 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Anjan Dave
18:47 Re: Help with query plan inconsistencies Joseph Shraibman
19:17 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Josh Berkus
19:20 SLOW query with aggregates A Palmblad
19:33 Re: SLOW query with aggregates Tom Lane
20:07 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Subbiah, Stalin
20:08 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux scott.marlowe
20:22 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux matt@ymogen.net
20:22 Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Darcy Buskermolen
20:44 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Craig Thomas
21:03 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Andrew Sullivan
21:10 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Bill Moran
21:18 Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Tom Lane
21:20 Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Josh Berkus
21:27 Re: atrocious update performance Greg Spiegelberg
21:48 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Aaron Werman
21:52 Re: atrocious update performance Tom Lane
21:55 Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Josh Berkus
22:00 Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Tom Lane
22:18 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Subbiah, Stalin
22:35 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux matt@ymogen.net

24 March 2004

02:42 Re: SLOW query with aggregates Greg Stark
07:52 Re: Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Mark Kirkwood
08:07 Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Mark Kirkwood
08:25 Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! Mark Kirkwood
10:34 slow vacuum performance pginfo
11:04 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Andrew Sullivan
11:39 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Matt Clark
12:59 Re: Help with query plan inconsistencies George Woodring
13:07 Re: slow vacuum performance Bill Moran
14:35 Re: slow vacuum performance pginfo
15:31 Re: slow vacuum performance scott.marlowe
15:38 Re: atrocious update performance Rosser Schwarz
15:50 Re: Help with query plan inconsistencies Richard Huxton
16:06 Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux Vivek Khera
17:04 Re: slow vacuum performance pginfo
17:23 Re: slow vacuum performance pginfo
17:23 Re: slow vacuum performance scott.marlowe

25 March 2004

16:46 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking markw@osdl.org
16:58 column size too large, is this a bug? Qing Zhao
17:20 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Tom Lane
17:56 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
18:12 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Josh Berkus
21:31 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Tom Lane
21:41 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Qing Zhao
22:06 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Stephan Szabo
22:27 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking markw@osdl.org
22:39 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Qing Zhao
23:39 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Tom Lane

26 March 2004

00:22 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Josh Berkus
01:04 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Tom Lane
01:41 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Christopher Kings-Lynne
02:11 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Tom Lane
02:18 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Christopher Kings-Lynne
16:38 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Qing Zhao
16:49 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking markw@osdl.org
17:08 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Bruce Momjian
17:21 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Josh Berkus
18:28 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking markw@osdl.org
20:23 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Manfred Spraul
20:23 Re: [ADMIN] Databases Vs. Schemas Adam Ruth
20:33 postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Fabio Esposito
20:34 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Manfred Spraul
20:35 Re: [ADMIN] Databases Vs. Schemas Adam Ruth
20:37 bigint index not used Shiar
20:41 odd planner choice Ara Anjargolian
20:54 Databases Vs. Schemas Subbiah, Stalin
20:59 Re: Databases Vs. Schemas CoL
22:34 Re: bigint index not used Tom Lane
22:36 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking Steve Atkins
23:03 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Josh Berkus
23:10 Re: odd planner choice Tom Lane
23:23 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 scott.marlowe
23:29 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Josh Berkus
23:43 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Tom Lane
23:51 Re: odd planner choice scott.marlowe
23:55 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 scott.marlowe

27 March 2004

00:20 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Tom Lane
02:01 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Andrew Rawnsley
09:38 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes

28 March 2004

16:17 Re: severe performance issue with planner Tom Lane
18:25 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Josh Berkus
18:26 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Josh Berkus
18:48 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Andrew Rawnsley

29 March 2004

09:57 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes
12:13 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Fabio Esposito
14:36 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Tom Lane
16:04 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Fabio Esposito
16:05 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Jaime Casanova
16:24 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Mark Lubratt
16:24 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Andrew Rawnsley
16:36 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Bruno Wolff III
16:41 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Jaime Casanova
18:13 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Josh Berkus
18:15 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Josh Berkus
18:40 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Fabio Esposito
19:24 Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 Josh Berkus
20:59 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem Jaime Casanova

30 March 2004

07:23 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem Richard Huxton
13:10 Cleanup query takes along time Rob Fielding
15:44 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem Josh Berkus
15:48 Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug? Josh Berkus
15:53 Re: column size too large, is this a bug? Robert Treat
16:36 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem Richard Huxton
18:25 select slow? Jaime Casanova
18:39 Re: select slow? Paul Thomas
19:06 Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug? Robert Treat
19:13 Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug? Josh Berkus
19:59 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem Joshua D. Drake
20:53 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem Josh Berkus
22:06 LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include wildcard Palle Girgensohn
23:16 Re: LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include wildcard Tom Lane
23:28 Re: LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include Palle Girgensohn
23:56 Re: LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include Josh Berkus

31 March 2004

00:04 Re: LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include Palle Girgensohn
00:08 Re: LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include Josh Berkus
04:34 Re: LIKE should use index when condition doesn't include Tom Lane
07:33 Re: select slow? Richard Huxton
08:50 What index for 'like (%keyword%)' ??? Priem, Alexander
11:08 Re: What index for 'like (%keyword%)' ??? Richard Huxton
13:28 Re: select slow? Jaime Casanova
14:42 Re: select slow? Tom Lane
19:28 Re: select slow? Paul Thomas
22:51 linux and anotime mount option Gaetano Mendola