Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Arthur Ward
Subject Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart
Date
Msg-id 11658.68.62.129.152.1079538035.squirrel@award.gotdns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart
List pgsql-performance
> The problem with Jan's more complex version of the patch (at least the
> one I found - perhaps not the right one) is it includes a bunch of other
> experimental stuff that I'd not want to mess with at the moment. Would
> changing the input units (for the original patch) from milli-secs to
> micro-secs be a bad idea? If so, I guess I'll get to extracting what I
> need from Jan's patch.

Jan's vacuum-delay-only patch that nobody can find is here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-11/msg00518.php

I've been using it in testing & production without any problems.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: atrocious update performance
Next
From: "Rosser Schwarz"
Date:
Subject: Re: atrocious update performance