Re: fsync method checking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: fsync method checking
Date
Msg-id 200403181734.i2IHYaR29308@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fsync method checking  ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
I have updated my program with your suggested changes and put in
src/tools/fsync.  Please see how you like it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>
> > Running the attached test program shows on BSD/OS 4.3:
> >
> >     write                  0.000360
> >     write & fsync          0.001391
>
> I think the "write & fsync" pays for the previous "write" test (same filename).
>
> >     write, close & fsync   0.001308
> >     open o_fsync, write    0.000924
>
> I have tried to modify the program to more closely resemble WAL
> writes (all writes to WAL are 8k), the file is usually already open,
> and test larger (16k) transactions.
>
> zeu@a82101002:~> test_sync1
> write                      0.000625
> write & fsync              0.016748
> write & fdatasync          0.006650
> write, close & fsync       0.017084
> write, close & fdatasync   0.006890
> open o_dsync, write        0.015997
> open o_dsync, one write    0.007128
>
> For the last line xlog.c would need to be modified, but the measurements
> seem to imply that it is only worth it on platforms that have O_DSYNC
> but not fdatasync.
>
> Andreas

Content-Description: test_sync1.c

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jon Jensen
Date:
Subject: Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: fsync method checking