Re: Cluster failure due to space - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Shea,Dan [CIS]
Subject Re: Cluster failure due to space
Date
Msg-id F2D63B916C88C14D9B59F93C2A5DD33F0B91A0@cisxa.cis.ec.gc.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Cluster failure due to space  ("Shea,Dan [CIS]" <Dan.Shea@ec.gc.ca>)
List pgsql-performance


"Shea,Dan [CIS]" <Dan.Shea@ec.gc.ca> writes:
>> The problem is that it did not clean itself up properly.

>Hm.  It should have done so.  What were the exact filenames and sizes of
>the not-deleted files?
361716097 to 361716097.39 are 1073741824 bytes.
361716097.40 is 186105856 bytes.

> I can not find any reference to 361716097 in the pg_class table.

>>You are looking at pg_class.relfilenode, I hope, not pg_class.oid.
Yes I am looking through pg_class.relfilenode.

Dan.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cluster failure due to space
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9