Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
Date
Msg-id 20040323220338.GA14682@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux  (matt@ymogen.net)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:53:42PM -0000, matt@ymogen.net wrote:

> is way down the priority list compared with IO throughput, stability,
> manageability, support, etc etc.

Indeed, if our Suns actually diabled the broken hardware when they
died, fell over, and rebooted themselves, I'd certainly praise them
to heaven.  But I have to say that the really very good reporting of
failing memory has saved me some headaches.

> environment, I'd take the Sun every day of the week, assuming that those
> compile option changes have sorted out the oddly slow PG performance at
> last.

I seem to have hit a bad batch of Dell hardware recently, which makes
me second this opinion.

I should say, also, that my initial experience of AIX has been
extremely good.  I can't comment on the fun it might involve in the
long haul, of course.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
        --Dennis Ritchie

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
Next
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux