Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Date
Msg-id 4069DFA1.50109@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
List pgsql-performance
>
> True, but on the sorts of commodity boxes I use, it doesn't make sense for me
> to waste time setting up non-standard filesystems - it's cheaper to spend a
> little more for better performance. I think SuSE offer Reiser though, so
> maybe we'll see a wider selection available by default.

SuSE defaults to Reiser but also allows XFS. I would suggest XFS.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem