Re: [PERFORM] fsync method checking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [PERFORM] fsync method checking
Date
Msg-id 200403251110.55889.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] fsync method checking  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce,

> We don't actually extend the WAL file during writes (preallocated), and
> the access/modification timestamp is only in seconds, so I wonder of the
> OS only updates the inode once a second.  What else would change in the
> inode more frequently than once a second?

What about really big writes, when WAL files are getting added/recycled?

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] fsync method checking
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested transaction proposal - take N (N > 2)