Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Date
Msg-id 200403300922.42448.dev@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem  ("Jaime Casanova" <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Monday 29 March 2004 22:56, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> ok. if i don't misunderstand you (english is not my mother tongue, so i can
> be wrong). your point is that speed is not necesarily performance, that's
> right.
>
> so, the real question is what is the best filesystem for optimal speed in
> postgresql?

That's going to depend on a number of things:

1. Size of database
2. Usage patterns (many updates or mostly reads? single user or many?...)
3. What hardware you've got
4. What OS you're running.
5. How you've configured your hardware, OS and PG.

There are some test results people have provided in the archives, but whether
they apply to your setup is open to argument.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Next
From: Rob Fielding
Date:
Subject: Cleanup query takes along time