Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 November 2004

00:10 Speeding up Gist Index creations mallah@trade-india.com
02:59 Re: Speeding up Gist Index creations Josh Berkus
04:23 Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] ARC Memory Usage analysis Gaetano Mendola
16:00 Re: Thanks Chariot Solutions D'Arcy J.M. Cain
16:46 Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB) Gavin Sherry
17:05 Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB) Bruce Momjian
19:04 Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB) Tom Lane
20:38 shared_buffers and Shared Memory Segments Anjan Dave
21:50 Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB) Josh Berkus

2 November 2004

00:44 Performance difference when using views Alvaro Nunes Melo
01:06 Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] ARC Memory Usage analysis Simon Riggs
01:08 Re: Performance difference when using views Tom Lane
01:31 Re: Performance difference when using views Simon Riggs
04:36 Re: Speeding up Gist Index creations Neil Conway
08:59 Re: Speeding up Gist Index creations Josh Berkus

3 November 2004

02:54 Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
17:18 Re: Restricting Postgres Andrew Sullivan
20:31 preloading indexes
20:59 Re: preloading indexes Matt Clark
21:56 vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
22:12 Re: preloading indexes
22:18 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query Doug Y
22:24 Re: Restricting Postgres Simon Riggs
22:36 Re: preloading indexes Andrew Sullivan
22:50 Re: preloading indexes Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
22:56 Re: preloading indexes Tom Lane
23:13 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query Tom Lane
23:20 Re: preloading indexes
23:53 Re: preloading indexes Tom Lane
23:53 Re: preloading indexes Andrew Sullivan
23:56 Re: preloading indexes

4 November 2004

01:00 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
01:23 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
02:26 Re: Restricting Postgres John A Meinel
02:36 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
03:52 Re: preloading indexes Mike Benoit
10:51 index not used if using IN or OR Mario Ivankovits
11:30 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
11:32 Re: index not used if using IN or OR Richard Huxton
14:01 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Markus Schaber
15:21 Re: Restricting Postgres Simon Riggs
15:29 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
16:10 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
16:17 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
17:02 Re: preloading indexes Andrew Sullivan
17:53 Re: index not used if using IN or OR Tom Lane
19:15 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
19:23 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Chris Browne
19:34 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
19:48 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
20:26 Re: Restricting Postgres Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
20:59 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
21:05 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
21:22 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
22:08 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Simon Riggs
22:20 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Steinar H. Gunderson
22:34 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Tom Lane
23:30 Re: Restricting Postgres Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
23:31 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
23:43 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Simon Riggs

5 November 2004

00:01 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Tom Lane
00:03 Re: Restricting Postgres Steinar H. Gunderson
00:06 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
00:06 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
00:11 Better Hardware, worst Results Alvaro Nunes Melo
00:18 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results Rod Taylor
00:46 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results Tom Lane
01:00 Re: Restricting Postgres Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
01:33 appropriate indexing T E Schmitz
01:39 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
01:41 Re: appropriate indexing Matt Clark
01:42 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results al_nunes@atua.com.br
01:59 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results Matt Clark
02:00 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results Rod Taylor
02:03 Re: Restricting Postgres Bruno Wolff III
02:09 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results Matt Clark
02:23 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
02:23 Re: Restricting Postgres Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
02:33 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
02:36 Re: Restricting Postgres Matt Clark
05:54 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Christopher Browne
05:55 Re: Restricting Postgres Martin Foster
05:55 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Christopher Browne
07:29 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Neil Conway
07:34 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Neil Conway
07:42 Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'? Neil Conway
08:05 Re: Restricting Postgres Bruno Wolff III
10:17 Checking = with timestamp field is slow Antony Paul
11:15 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Michael Glaesemann
11:33 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Michael Glaesemann
11:34 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Michael Fuhr
11:48 Re: Restricting Postgres Leeuw van der, Tim
11:49 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Andrew McMillan
12:13 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Michael Fuhr
15:55 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Christopher Browne
17:39 Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
18:06 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Matt Clark
18:09 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Rod Taylor
18:32 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
18:38 postgresql amd-64 Merlin Moncure
19:54 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
20:42 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Bruno Wolff III
20:46 Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow Michael Fuhr
20:56 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
21:10 What is the difference between these? Matt Nuzum
21:23 Re: postgresql amd-64 Daniel Ceregatti
21:26 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
21:34 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Matt Clark
22:44 Re: What is the difference between these? Matthew T. O'Connor
22:58 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Tom Lane
23:33 Re: What is the difference between these? Tom Lane
23:36 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel

6 November 2004

00:00 Question regarding the file system Gabriele Bartolini
00:03 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
00:10 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Tom Lane
00:18 Re: postgresql amd-64 Merlin Moncure
01:40 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
02:13 ia64 results with dbt2 and 8.0beta4 Mark Wong
03:14 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Matt Clark
03:27 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
06:03 Re: postgresql amd-64 Vishal Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]
07:04 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Tom Lane
07:08 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query Tom Lane
09:18 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
09:39 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query Tom Lane
10:27 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
22:58 poor performance in migrated database Carlos Lopez
23:41 Re: poor performance in migrated database Troels Arvin

7 November 2004

00:41 Re: poor performance in migrated database Simon Riggs
00:58 Re: poor performance in migrated database Scott Marlowe
14:04 DISTINCT and GROUP BY: possible performance enhancement? Ang Chin Han

8 November 2004

05:12 Re: postgresql amd-64 Iain
06:10 Re: Restricting Postgres Matthew Nuzum
07:00 Re: poor performance in migrated database Troels Arvin
10:36 Re: postgresql amd-64 Iain
13:40 Postgresql is using seqscan when is should use indexes. Andreas Åkre Solberg
14:40 Re: postgresql amd-64 Radu-Adrian Popescu
14:47 Re: Better Hardware, worst Results Alvaro Nunes Melo
15:07 Re: Postgresql is using seqscan when is should use indexes. Russell Smith
15:26 ext3 journalling type Dawid Kuroczko
16:20 Re: postgresql amd-64 Merlin Moncure
17:05 Re: ext3 journalling type Bruce Momjian
18:14 Re: ext3 journalling type Matt Clark
19:30 Re: ext3 journalling type Mark Wong
20:39 Re: ext3 journalling type Josh Berkus
20:45 Re: Question regarding the file system Josh Berkus
21:57 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
22:31 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query John Meinel

9 November 2004

00:28 Re: [ADMIN] poor performance in migrated database Carlos Lopez
02:20 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~
02:58 Re: [ADMIN] poor performance in migrated database Tom Lane
03:02 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query John Meinel
03:05 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
03:12 Slow performance with Group By Erik Norvelle
03:32 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query John Meinel
03:56 Re: Slow performance with Group By Tom Lane
04:29 Re: Question regarding the file system Josh Berkus
17:56 Re: [ADMIN] poor performance in migrated database Carlos Lopez
22:01 Need advice on postgresql.conf settings Shane | SkinnyCorp
22:26 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query patrick ~

10 November 2004

00:57 Re: Need advice on postgresql.conf settings Tom Lane
01:44 Re: Need advice on postgresql.conf settings Sean Chittenden
01:52 seqscan strikes again Jim C. Nasby
02:14 Re: seqscan strikes again Joshua D. Drake
02:24 Re: seqscan strikes again Tom Lane
12:36 simple select-statement takes more than 25 sec Cao Duy
13:18 Re: simple select-statement takes more than 25 sec Steinar H. Gunderson
13:29 Re: simple select-statement takes more than 25 sec gnari
14:22 Re: simple select-statement takes more than 25 sec Cao Duy
14:45 Re: simple select-statement takes more than 25 sec Steinar H. Gunderson
16:04 Re: Need advice on postgresql.conf settings Jeff
16:52 How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Michael Kleiser
16:55 Re: How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Jeff
17:04 Re: How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Dave Cramer
17:27 Re: How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Leeuw van der, Tim
20:01 Re: seqscan strikes again Jim C. Nasby
20:06 Solaris 9 Tuning Tips requested Rod Taylor

11 November 2004

00:51 int4 in a GiST index Mike Rylander
05:50 Re: int4 in a GiST index George Essig
08:53 Re: int4 in a GiST index Mike Rylander
11:05 Re: How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Edwin Eyan Moragas
21:07 Re: seqscan strikes again Gaetano Mendola
21:07 Re: How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Steinar H. Gunderson
21:09 Re: vacuum analyze slows sql query Gaetano Mendola
21:36 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
21:51 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Josh Berkus
22:33 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
23:49 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Greg Stark

12 November 2004

00:11 Re: How to speed-up inserts with jdbc Edwin Eyan Moragas
00:13 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
00:42 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Tom Lane
00:48 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Joshua D. Drake
21:39 Clarification on two bits on VACUUM FULL VERBOSE output Josh Berkus
22:20 Re: Clarification on two bits on VACUUM FULL VERBOSE output Tom Lane
23:12 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel

13 November 2004

00:09 Re: Clarification on two bits on VACUUM FULL VERBOSE output Josh Berkus
00:19 Re: Clarification on two bits on VACUUM FULL VERBOSE output Tom Lane
01:40 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Tom Lane
06:03 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
14:26 Insertion puzzles vivek singh
16:31 Re: Insertion puzzles Andreas Åkre Solberg
19:53 Re: Insertion puzzles Dave Cramer
20:13 Re: Insertion puzzles Stephan Szabo

14 November 2004

02:24 Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results William Yu
03:14 Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results Gustavo Franklin Nóbrega
03:24 Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results William Yu
03:54 Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results William Yu
04:37 Re: Insertion puzzles Josh Berkus
08:51 Tuning suggestions wanted Rod Taylor

15 November 2004

03:44 Re: Insertion puzzles Dave Cramer
10:04 Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results Greg Stark
10:55 Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results William Yu
18:23 Re: Large Database Performance suggestions Andrew Hammond
20:48 Question on pgsql optimisation of SQL and structure (index, etc) Alexandre Leclerc

16 November 2004

00:01 Re: Question on pgsql optimisation of SQL and structure (index, etc) Josh Berkus
00:23 Why distinct so slow ? Hervé Piedvache
01:22 Re: Strange (?) Index behavior? Allen Landsidel
02:10 Performance difference: SELECT from VIEW or not? Alexandre Leclerc
02:30 Re: Performance difference: SELECT from VIEW or not? Tom Lane
08:24 Re: Insertion puzzles dentfirst13@earthlink.net
12:09 mis-estimation on data-warehouse aggregate creation Kris Jurka
13:56 Re: mis-estimation on data-warehouse aggregate creation F. Senault
17:56 Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Hervé Piedvache
18:33 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Michael Fuhr
18:48 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Hervé Piedvache
18:59 Efficient way to remove OID data James Gunzelman
19:06 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Joshua D. Drake
19:09 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Joshua D. Drake
19:20 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Oleg Bartunov
19:23 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Hervé Piedvache
19:35 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Oleg Bartunov
22:43 Re: Insertion puzzles J. Andrew Rogers
22:49 Re: mis-estimation on data-warehouse aggregate creation Kris Jurka

17 November 2004

00:11 nuderstanding 'explain analyse' Alexandre Leclerc
00:13 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Oleg Bartunov
00:33 Re: mis-estimation on data-warehouse aggregate creation Simon Riggs
06:55 query plan question David Parker
07:02 memcached and PostgreSQL Michael Adler
07:36 Re: query plan question Russell Smith
08:31 Table Partitions: To Inherit Or Not To Inherit Don Drake
08:49 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
08:52 Re: Table Partitions: To Inherit Or Not To Inherit Josh Berkus
09:09 Re: nuderstanding 'explain analyse' Josh Berkus
09:41 Re: query plan question Joshua D. Drake
10:48 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Troels Arvin
11:08 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Greg Stark
11:19 Re: mis-estimation on data-warehouse aggregate creation Kris Jurka
15:33 Re: query plan question David Parker
16:09 Re: query plan question David Parker
17:00 Re: query plan question Jeff
17:43 Re: query plan question David Parker
18:06 Re: query plan question David Parker
18:46 Re: query plan question Tom Lane
18:59 Re: query plan question David Parker
19:09 Analyzer is clueless David Brown
19:18 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Mike Rylander
19:43 Re: query plan question Matthew T. O'Connor
20:13 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Darcy Buskermolen
20:17 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Hervé Piedvache
20:23 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Oleg Bartunov
22:04 Re: query plan question Matthew T. O'Connor
22:16 Re: Analyzer is clueless Josh Berkus
22:52 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Michael Adler

18 November 2004

00:03 Re: Analyzer is clueless Joshua D. Drake
00:04 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
00:31 sort_mem affect on inserts? David Parker
01:05 Re: sort_mem affect on inserts? Josh Berkus
01:14 postgres eating CPU silviapg@tiscali.it
01:24 Re: postgres eating CPU Josh Berkus
01:38 Re: Analyzer is clueless Simon Riggs
01:51 Re: postgres eating CPU silviapg@tiscali.it
02:21 Re: postgres eating CPU Josh Berkus
02:38 Re: postgres eating CPU Tom Lane
03:20 Re: Analyzer is clueless Jim C. Nasby
04:38 Re: Analyzer is clueless Josh Berkus
04:58 Re: Analyzer is clueless Tom Lane
06:31 Re: postgres eating CPU Joshua D. Drake
12:27 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Hervé Piedvache
12:37 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Oleg Bartunov
13:30 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Hervé Piedvache
13:34 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Oleg Bartunov
13:53 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? Leeuw van der, Tim
16:42 Query Performance and IOWait Andrew Janian
16:57 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com
17:02 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Andrew Janian
17:18 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Woody Woodring
18:40 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Tom Lane
18:57 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Andrew Janian
19:12 Re: query plan question David Parker
19:44 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Joshua D. Drake
20:09 Interaction between Free Space Map an alternate location for a database Dave Cramer
20:14 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Dave Cramer
21:20 Re: Interaction between Free Space Map an alternate location for a database Josh Berkus
21:35 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Josh Berkus
21:38 Re: Interaction between Free Space Map an alternate location for a database Tom Lane
21:43 Re: Interaction between Free Space Map an alternate location Dave Cramer
22:05 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Woody Woodring
22:46 Re: Interaction between Free Space Map an alternate location Dave Cramer

19 November 2004

00:10 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Sean Chittenden
17:00 When to bump up statistics? Dawid Kuroczko
18:34 Re: sort_mem affect on inserts? Jan Wieck
22:19 index use Arshavir Grigorian
23:00 Re: index use Steinar H. Gunderson

20 November 2004

01:15 Re: When to bump up statistics? Josh Berkus
01:16 Re: index use Josh Berkus
01:30 Re: index use Arshavir Grigorian
01:41 help needed -- sequential scan problem sarlav kumar
02:14 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Frank Wiles
02:24 Re: sort_mem affect on inserts? Josh Berkus
02:26 Re: index use Stephan Szabo
02:28 Re: index use Tom Lane
03:04 tablespace + RAM disk? David Parker
03:05 Re: When to bump up statistics? Chris Browne
03:05 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Andrew Janian
03:32 Re: tablespace + RAM disk? Josh Berkus
04:34 Re: tablespace + RAM disk? David Parker
07:19 Re: tablespace + RAM disk? David Parker
08:20 Re: help needed -- sequential scan problem Tom Lane
12:36 Re: tablespace + RAM disk? Dawid Kuroczko
17:18 Index usage for sorted query Markus Schaber
19:11 Re: Index usage for sorted query Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
19:48 Re: Index usage for sorted query Tom Lane

21 November 2004

04:42 Re: tablespace + RAM disk? Josh Berkus
04:43 Re: index use Josh Berkus
17:48 Re: tablespace + RAM disk? Neil Conway
17:51 Re: sort_mem affect on inserts? Neil Conway

22 November 2004

07:15 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
07:29 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
07:55 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Sean Chittenden
11:01 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Patrick B Kelly
15:28 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
18:02 Re: Index usage for sorted query Markus Schaber
18:21 Re: Query Performance and IOWait Anjan Dave
22:41 Re: help needed -- sequential scan problem sarlav kumar
22:55 Re: help needed -- sequential scan problem Josh Berkus
22:58 Re: help needed -- sequential scan problem sarlav kumar
22:59 Re: help needed -- sequential scan problem gnari
23:32 Data type to use for primary key Alexandre Leclerc

23 November 2004

00:38 Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Mike Mascari
00:46 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Mike Mascari
01:07 scalability issues on win32 Merlin Moncure
02:04 Re: Data type to use for primary key Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
02:13 Re: scalability issues on win32 Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
02:26 Re: Data type to use for primary key Alexandre Leclerc
03:52 Re: Data type to use for primary key Josh Berkus
04:05 Re: Data type to use for primary key Rod Taylor
05:18 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
05:26 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Bruce Momjian
09:02 Re: Data type to use for primary key Josh Berkus
11:38 Re: Data type to use for primary key Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
16:05 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Merlin Moncure
17:59 Re: Data type to use for primary key Peter Darley
18:06 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Bruce Momjian
19:26 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Magnus Hagander
19:30 Re: Data type to use for primary key Alexandre Leclerc
19:43 Re: Data type to use for primary key Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
20:07 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Merlin Moncure
20:20 Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results Cott Lang
20:54 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Tom Lane

24 November 2004

01:20 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Sean Chittenden
05:21 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Mike Mascari
07:40 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Bruce Momjian
08:40 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Jaime Casanova
09:12 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Tom Lane
09:31 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Tom Lane
09:51 FW: Index usage BBI Edwin Punzalan
09:53 Re: Data type to use for primary key Greg Stark
10:16 Re: Data type to use for primary key Tom Lane
10:35 Re: FW: Index usage Leeuw van der, Tim
11:07 FW: FW: Index usage BBI Edwin Punzalan
11:14 Re: Data type to use for primary key Greg Stark
11:32 Re: FW: Index usage gnari
12:40 Unsubscribe songtebo
12:43 Re: FW: Index usage BBI Edwin Punzalan
13:17 Re: FW: FW: Index usage Richard Huxton
13:39 Re: FW: FW: Index usage BBI Edwin Punzalan
14:02 Re: FW: FW: Index usage Richard Huxton
16:19 Postgres vs. MySQL Evilio del Rio
17:16 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Steinar H. Gunderson
17:27 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Richard Huxton
17:58 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Christian Fowler
18:39 Re: Data type to use for primary key Alexandre Leclerc
18:57 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Joshua D. Drake
19:06 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL Jim C. Nasby
19:26 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Steinar H. Gunderson
20:12 Re: [PERFORMANCE] Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database Jaime Casanova
20:37 "Group By " index usage sdfasdfas sdfasdfs
20:55 Re: "Group By " index usage Tom Lane
22:10 Re: FW: Index usage gnari

25 November 2004

01:51 Re: Slow execution time when querying view with WHERE clause Mike Mascari
04:18 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Steinar H. Gunderson
08:56 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Dave Page
08:57 Hardware purchase question Bo Stewart
08:58 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Reini Urban
08:59 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32 Dave Page
09:01 HELP speed up my Postgres JM
09:12 Re: HELP speed up my Postgres Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz]
09:30 Re: HELP speed up my Postgres JM
09:55 Re: HELP speed up my Postgres Tom Lane
09:57 Re: HELP speed up my Postgres Klint Gore
10:06 Re: HELP speed up my Postgres Christopher Kings-Lynne
15:38 Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Dave Cramer
23:35 Postgres backend using huge amounts of ram Gary Doades

26 November 2004

04:37 Re: Postgres vs. DSpam Andrew McMillan
06:25 Re: Postgres vs. DSpam Neil Conway
11:28 Re: [GENERAL] HELP speed up my Postgres Jerome Macaranas
12:12 Re: Postgres backend using huge amounts of ram Richard Huxton
20:13 time to stop tuning? David Parker
22:04 Re: time to stop tuning? Tom Lane
22:16 Re: time to stop tuning? David Parker
22:25 Re: Postgres backend using huge amounts of ram Tom Lane
22:42 Re: Postgres backend using huge amounts of ram Gary Doades

27 November 2004

20:54 Re: time to stop tuning? Rod Taylor
20:54 Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL Clifton Royston
20:54 Re: time to stop tuning? Rod Taylor
20:54 Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL Casey Allen Shobe
20:59 Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL Lionel Bouton
21:46 Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL Christopher Browne

30 November 2004

00:51 Re: Postgres vs. DSpam Jim C. Nasby
18:17 VACUUM ANALYZE downgrades performance Dmitry Karasik
18:33 Re: VACUUM ANALYZE downgrades performance Mike Rylander
18:37 Re: VACUUM ANALYZE downgrades performance Thomas Swan
19:05 Re: "Group By " index usage Alban Medici (NetCentrex)