Re: Better Hardware, worst Results - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Date
Msg-id 1099609109.1647.727.camel@home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better Hardware, worst Results  (al_nunes@atua.com.br)
Responses Re: Better Hardware, worst Results  (Matt Clark <matt@ymogen.net>)
Re: Better Hardware, worst Results  (Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes@atua.com.br>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 17:42, al_nunes@atua.com.br wrote:
> Citando Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>:
> > Please send an explain analyze from both.
> I'm sendin three explains. In the first the Dell machine didn't use existing
> indexes, so I turn enable_seqscan off (this is the second explain). The total
> cost decreased, but the total time not. The third explain refers to the cheaper
> (and faster) machine. The last thing is the query itself.

All 3 plans have crappy estimates.

Run ANALYZE in production, then send another explain analyze (as an
attachment please, to avoid linewrap).



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Matt Clark
Date:
Subject: Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Restricting Postgres