Postgres vs. MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Evilio del Rio |
---|---|
Subject | Postgres vs. MySQL |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1101302058.338.74.camel@haddock.cmima.csic.es Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Postgres vs. MySQL
Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Re: Postgres vs. MySQL Re: Postgres vs. DSpam Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL |
List | pgsql-performance |
Hi, I have installed the dspam filter (http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam) on our mail server (RedHat 7.3 Linux with sendmail 8.13 and procmail). I have ~300 users with a quite low traffic of 4000 messages/day. So it's a quite common platform/environment, nothing spectacular. First time(s) I tried the Postgres interface that was already installed for other applications. Whenever I begin to train and/or filter messages throug dspam the performance is incredibly bad. First messages are ok but soon the filter time begins to increase to about 30 seconds or more! ...so I looked for some optimization both for the linux kernel and the postgres server. Nothing has work for me. I always have the same behavior. For isolation purposes I started using another server just to hold the dspam database and nothing else. No matter what I do: postgres gets slower and slower with each new message fed or filtered. Several strategies have failed: newest RPMs from postgresql.org, pg_autovacuum, etc. I finally tried the MySQL driver. I have started using this tool right now for dspam, so I am a newcomer in MySQL. The result: after some preparation in configuring some parameters for mysqld (with the "QuickStart" Guide from mysql.com) all works fine! It's incredible! the same servers, the same messages, the same dspam compilation (well each one with the corresponding --with-storage-driver=*sql_drv). Postgres is getting worst than 30s/message and MySQL process the same in less than a second. I can surrender the Postgres server by just corpus-feeding one single short message to each user (it takes hours to process 300 users!). On the other hand, MySQL only takes a few minutes to process the same batch. I do not want to make flame over Postgres (I have always prefered it for its capabilities) but I am absolutely impressed by MySQL (I have seen the light!) Please, could anyone explain me this difference? Is Postgres that bad? Is MySQL that good? Am I the only one to have observed this behavior? TIA. Cheers, ---------------------------------------------------------------- Evilio Jose del Rio Silvan Centre Mediterrani d'Investigacions edelrio@cmima.csic.es Marines i Ambientals "Microsoft sells you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house" - Anonymous
pgsql-performance by date: