Tom Lane wrote:
> Um ... doh ... analyze.c about line 1550:
>
> /* We can only compute valid stats if we found some non-null values. */
> if (nonnull_cnt > 0)
> ...
>
> There's a bit of an epistemological issue here: if we didn't actually
> find any nonnull values in our sample, is it legitimate to assume that
> the column is entirely null? On the other hand, if we find only "3" in
> our sample we will happily assume the column contains only "3", so I
> dunno why we are discriminating against null. This seems like a case
> that just hasn't come up before.
Will this discriminatory policy toward null end for 8.0?
Mike Mascari
