Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] ARC Memory Usage analysis - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] ARC Memory Usage analysis
Date
Msg-id cm42gu$14nu$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] ARC Memory Usage analysis  (Thomas F.O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>
> As a result, I was intending to inflate the value of
> effective_cache_size to closer to the amount of unused RAM on some of
> the machines I admin (once I've verified that they all have a unified
> buffer cache). Is that correct?
>

Effective cache size is IMHO a "bogus" parameter on postgresql.conf,
this because:

1) That parameter is not intended to instruct postgres to use that ram but
    is only an hint to the engine on what the "DBA" *believe* the OS cache
    memory for postgres
2) This parameter change only the cost evaluation of plans ( and not soo
    much )

so don't hope to double this parameter and push postgres to use more RAM.



Regards
Gaetano Mendola





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Speeding up Gist Index creations
Next
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
Date:
Subject: Re: Thanks Chariot Solutions