Re: [PERFORMANCE] Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: [PERFORMANCE] Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database
Date
Msg-id 20041124171156.85485.qmail@web50001.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-performance
 --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escribió:
> "Constantin Teodorescu" <teo@flex.ro> writes:
> > If I will choose to keep a mirror of every
> > workstation database in a
> > separate schema in the central database that mean
> > that I will have 3500 different schemas.
>
> > Is there any limit or any barrier that could stop
> > this kind of approach or make things go slower?
>
> Would you need to put them all into "search_path" at
> once?
>
> I'm not sure what the scaling issues might be for
> long search_paths, but I wouldn't be surprised if
> it's bad.  But as long as you don't do that,
> I don't believe there will be any problems.
>

if i do a select with fully qualified table names it
will search in the search_path or it will go directly
to the schema?

Just for know.

regards,
Jaime Casanova

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres vs. MySQL
Next
From: sdfasdfas sdfasdfs
Date:
Subject: "Group By " index usage