Re: memcached and PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Troels Arvin
Subject Re: memcached and PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id pan.2004.11.17.07.48.31.163515@arvin.dk
Whole thread Raw
In response to memcached and PostgreSQL  (Michael Adler <adler@pobox.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

> So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but not
> updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable.   An
> example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web
> session information ... or simple materialized views.

Has anyone tried at least two of

1. memcached
2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think)
3. Sharedance

In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks?


Links:

1: http://www.danga.com/memcached/

2: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tugela_Cache
   http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wikipedia/tugelacache/

3: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/

--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: query plan question
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: memcached and PostgreSQL