On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:13:09AM -0800, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> On November 16, 2004 08:00 pm, Michael Adler wrote:
> > http://pugs.postgresql.org/sfpug/archives/000021.html
> >
> > I noticed that some of you left coasters were talking about memcached
> > and pgsql. I'm curious to know what was discussed.
>
> Have a look at the pdf presentation found on the following site:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/pgmemcache/
Thanks for that.
That presentation was rather broad and the API seems rather general
purpose, but I wonder why you would really want access the cache by
way of the DB? If one major point of memcache is to allocate RAM to a
low-overhead server instead of to the RDBMS's disk cache, why would
you add the overhead of the RDBMS to the process? (this is a bit of
straw man, but just trying to flesh-out the pros and cons)
Still, it seems like a convenient way to maintain cache coherency,
assuming that your application doesn't already have a clean way to do
that.
(just my uninformed opinion, though...)
-Mike
