Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 November 2017

• 00:05   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Robert Haas
• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Peter Eisentraut
• 00:59   using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Sergei Kornilov
• 01:07   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Mark Dilger
• 01:16   Re: With commit 4e5fe9ad19, range partition missing handling for theNULL partition key Robert Haas
• 01:17   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: Typo in ExecBuildSlotPartitionKeyDescription prologue Robert Haas
• 01:51   pgindent run? Robert Haas
• 01:54   Re: pgindent run? Andres Freund
• 01:55   Re: pgindent run? Robert Haas
• 01:57   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Mark Dilger
• 02:00   Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT lines to some variables Brian Cloutier
• 02:06   Re: pgindent run? Mark Dilger
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Юрий Соколов
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager Robert Haas
• 02:37   Re: pgindent run? Tom Lane
• 02:40   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Tom Lane
• 02:47   Re: pgindent run? Tom Lane
• 02:50   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump Robert Haas
• 02:54   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Robert Haas
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Robert Haas
• 03:22   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Peter Eisentraut
• 03:23   Re: pgindent run? Thomas Munro
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Tom Lane
• 03:36   Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Feike Steenbergen
• 03:38   Re: pgindent run? Tom Lane
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug Robert Haas
• 03:43   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Feike Steenbergen
• 03:44   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Robert Haas
• 03:48   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Peter Geoghegan
• 03:54   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Feike Steenbergen
• 03:55   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Peter Geoghegan
• 04:08   Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Michael Paquier
• 04:17   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Peter Geoghegan
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: Add support for INSERT OVERRIDING clause Peter Eisentraut
• 04:26   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Mark Dilger
• 04:33   Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Michael Paquier
• 04:34   Re: pgindent run? Mark Dilger
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Michael Paquier
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Andres Freund
• 04:42   Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Peter Eisentraut
• 04:51   Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT lines to some variables Michael Paquier
• 04:57   Re: pgindent run? Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Peter Geoghegan
• 05:12   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: Add support for INSERT OVERRIDING clause Tom Lane
• 05:16   Re: pgindent run? Mark Dilger
• 05:26   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Stephen Frost
• 05:26   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Michael Paquier
• 05:42   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug Joe Conway
• 06:25   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug Robert Haas
• 06:38   Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion Amit Langote
• 06:40   Re: With commit 4e5fe9ad19, range partition missing handling for theNULL partition key Amit Langote
• 07:14   Re: Fix a typo in xact.c Masahiko Sawada
• 07:24   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 07:37   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Michael Paquier
• 07:41   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Michael Paquier
• 07:43   Re: [HACKERS] Range Merge Join v1 Michael Paquier
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Michael Paquier
• 07:47   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index Michael Paquier
• 07:50   Re: Jsonb transform for pl/python Michael Paquier
• 07:53   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index Michael Paquier
• 07:54   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) Michael Paquier
• 07:58   Re: [HACKERS] Causal reads take II Michael Paquier
• 08:02   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays Michael Paquier
• 08:04   Re: [HACKERS] Causal reads take II Thomas Munro
• 08:05   Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback Michael Paquier
• 08:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Is anything preventing us from allowing write toforeign tables from standby? Michael Paquier
• 08:09   Re: [HACKERS] Causal reads take II Michael Paquier
• 08:13   Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows Craig Ringer
• 08:14   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering Michael Paquier
• 08:16   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Michael Paquier
• 08:19   Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Michael Paquier
• 08:21   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key Amit Kapila
• 08:21   Re: [HACKERS] Add Roman numeral conversion to to_number Michael Paquier
• 08:24   Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows Andres Freund
• 08:24   Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL Michael Paquier
• 08:27   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: support parameterized foreign joins Michael Paquier
• 08:29   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views Michael Paquier
• 09:05   Re: PG10.1 autovac killed building extended stats Alvaro Herrera
• 09:20   Re: Code cleanup patch submission for extended_stats.c Alvaro Herrera
• 09:29   Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp Michael Paquier
• 09:43   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat
• 09:45   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Peter Geoghegan
• 10:38   Re: scan-build plpython stuff John Naylor
• 10:41   Re: new function for tsquery creartion Michael Paquier
• 10:45   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Michael Paquier
• 10:50   Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage Michael Paquier
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw Michael Paquier
• 10:53   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: Add support for INSERT OVERRIDING clause Michael Paquier
• 10:57   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? Michael Paquier
• 10:59   Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions Michael Paquier
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Michael Paquier
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT Michael Paquier
• 11:05   Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw Michael Paquier
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures Michael Paquier
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY Michael Paquier
• 11:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed Michael Paquier
• 11:25   Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall Michael Paquier
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" testpending solution of its timing is (fwd) Michael Paquier
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Andrey Borodin
• 11:33   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) Michael Paquier
• 11:35   Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ Michael Paquier
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Michael Paquier
• 11:46   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Restricting pg_rewind to data/wal dirs Michael Paquier
• 11:48   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 11:48   Re: [HACKERS] Function to move the position of a replication slot Michael Paquier
• 11:50   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Michael Paquier
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Michael Paquier
• 13:58   TupleDescCopy doesn't clear atthasdef, attnotnull, attidentity Thomas Munro
• 14:09   Expression based grouping equality implementation Andres Freund
• 14:34   Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com Amit Kapila
• 14:36   Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com Amit Kapila
• 14:40   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Fabien COELHO
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key amul sul
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Ashutosh Bapat
• 16:30   Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY Tomas Vondra
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY Alexander Korotkov
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY Andrey Borodin
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 17:39   Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work Feike Steenbergen
• 17:55   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY Alexander Korotkov
• 18:30   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Restricting pg_rewind to data/wal dirs David Steele
• 18:30   es_query_dsa is broken Thomas Munro
• 18:38   Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY Michael Paquier
• 18:58   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Robert Haas
• 19:10   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Fabien COELHO
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. Simon Riggs
• 20:12   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Stephen Frost
• 20:15   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Robert Haas
• 20:26   Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ Peter Eisentraut
• 20:26   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Fabien COELHO
• 20:41   Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ Robert Haas
• 20:56   Re: new function for tsquery creartion Victor Drobny
• 20:57   Re: new function for tsquery creartion Victor Drobny
• 21:01   Re: es_query_dsa is broken Robert Haas
• 21:03   Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Robert Haas
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. Masahiko Sawada
• 21:21   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Stephen Frost
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication Petr Jelinek
• 21:47   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Tom Lane
• 21:52   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Sergei Kornilov
• 21:58   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Stephen Frost
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions Petr Jelinek
• 22:00   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Robert Haas
• 22:15   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Stephen Frost
• 22:53   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Sergei Kornilov
• 22:55   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Andres Freund
• 23:50   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index Shubham Barai