Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

9 November 2017

• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] need info about extensibility in other databases Oleg Bartunov
• 01:12   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II Andres Freund
• 02:44   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Юрий Соколов
• 02:49   [HACKERS] [PATCH] fix wrong create table statement in documentation jotpe
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Andres Freund
• 03:05   Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks Tom Lane
• 03:05   [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Luke Lonergan
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Thomas Munro
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] OpenTemporaryFile() vs resowner.c Tom Lane
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] Early locking option to parallel backup Lucas B
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples Peter Geoghegan
• 04:20   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Luke Lonergan
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] fix wrong create table statement in documentation Tom Lane
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_internal.init from base backup Michael Paquier
• 04:49   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 05:07   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Luke Lonergan
• 05:19   Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use Michael Paquier
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN() Asim Praveen
• 05:48   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Simon Riggs
• 05:57   [HACKERS] postgresql v9.5 and SSL: LOG: could not accept SSL connection: tlsv1alert iso-8859-1 ca Graham Leggett
• 06:39   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 06:44   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Luke Lonergan
• 06:50   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Thomas Munro
• 07:02   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] fix wrong create table statement indocumentation Amit Langote
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal ofsuperuser() checks Michael Paquier
• 08:09   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN() Michael Paquier
• 09:15   Re: [HACKERS] Hang in pldebugger after git commit : 98a64d0 Andres Freund
• 09:33   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation Ashutosh Bapat
• 09:57   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Thomas Munro
• 10:03   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 11:08   Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila
• 11:09   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Thomas Munro
• 11:27   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 11:42   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Thomas Munro
• 14:14   [HACKERS] (spelling) Ensure header of postgresql.auto.conf is consistent Feike Steenbergen
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Amit Kapila
• 14:55   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages amul sul
• 15:11   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) Pavel Stehule
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] (spelling) Ensure header of postgresql.auto.conf is consistent Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] (spelling) Ensure header of postgresql.auto.conf is consistent Michael Paquier
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Fix bloom WAL tap test Alexander Korotkov
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning amul sul
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 17:27   [HACKERS] libpq connection strings: control over the cipher suites? Graham Leggett
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] Jsonb transform for pl/python Aleksander Alekseev
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution Arthur Zakirov
• 18:42   [HACKERS] Reorder header files in alphabetical order Etsuro Fujita
• 21:07   [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c a.akenteva@postgrespro.ru
• 21:28   Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager Robert Haas
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Robert Haas
• 21:38   Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] Pg V10: Patch for bug in bonjour support Tom Lane
• 22:06   Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c Alvaro Herrera
• 22:17   Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c Tom Lane
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c Tom Lane
• 22:58   Re: [HACKERS] (spelling) Ensure header of postgresql.auto.conf is consistent Tom Lane
• 23:14   [HACKERS] Aggregates push-down to partitions Konstantin Knizhnik
• 23:32   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 23:49   [HACKERS] pageinspect option to forgo buffer locking? Andres Freund
• 23:51   Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect option to forgo buffer locking? Peter Geoghegan
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] libpq connection strings: control over the ciphersuites? Joe Conway
• 23:55   Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect option to forgo buffer locking? Robert Haas
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect option to forgo buffer locking? Andres Freund