Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c
Date
Msg-id 21764.1510244486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I think odd coding this was introduced recently because of the
> pg_resetxlog -> pg_resetwal renaming.

Dunno about that, but certainly somebody fat-fingered a refactoring
there.  The 9.6 code looks quite different but doesn't seem to be
doing anything silly.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] (spelling) Ensure header of postgresql.auto.conf is consistent