Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

15 November 2017

• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Peter Geoghegan
• 00:09   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Peter Eisentraut
• 00:12   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Robert Haas
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov
• 00:43   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Simon Riggs
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures Simon Riggs
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Robert Haas
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 01:07   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Jesper Pedersen
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan
• 02:04   PGLister: how to subscribe to digests instead of getting every email? Ryan Murphy
• 02:27   Re: PGLister: how to subscribe to digests instead of getting everyemail? Stephen Frost
• 02:40   Re: PGLister: how to subscribe to digests instead of getting every email? Ryan Murphy
• 02:51   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Robert Haas
• 03:24   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II Andres Freund
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting Dmitry Dolgov
• 03:33   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Merlin Moncure
• 03:46   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Alvaro Herrera
• 04:09   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table David Rowley
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication Ashwin Agrawal
• 04:40   Re: Transaction control in procedures legrand legrand
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures Peter Eisentraut
• 05:07   Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication Michael Paquier
• 05:09   Separate leader buffer info and worker wait info in EXPLAIN output? Thomas Munro
• 05:13   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning David Rowley
• 05:14   Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures Tom Lane
• 05:27   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Peter Eisentraut
• 05:38   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Peter Eisentraut
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Masahiko Sawada
• 06:53   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Amit Langote
• 06:59   Re: [HACKERS] moving some partitioning code to executor Amit Langote
• 07:05   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Michael Paquier
• 07:17   Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL Nikita Glukhov
• 08:16   Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning Amit Langote
• 09:00   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure Steve Singer
• 09:12   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Masahiko Sawada
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Michael Paquier
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure Fabien COELHO
• 12:00   Re: [HACKERS] How to implement a SP-GiST index as a extension module? Connor Wolf
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath David Rowley
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Beena Emerson
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums Michael Paquier
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add recovery_min_apply_delay_reconnect recovery option Michael Paquier
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] Transform for pl/perl Pavel Stehule
• 14:10   no library dependency in Makefile? 高增琦
• 14:20   Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal ofsuperuser() checks Michael Paquier
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Masahiko Sawada
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted. Michael Paquier
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures Laurenz Albe
• 14:58   Re: Transform for pl/perl Aleksander Alekseev
• 15:01   Re: Schedule for migration to pglister Noah Misch
• 15:01   Re: Schedule for migration to pglister Noah Misch
• 15:09   Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Ildus Kurbangaliev
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] Transform for pl/perl Oleg Bartunov
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] Transform for pl/perl Pavel Stehule
• 15:41   pspg - psql pager Pavel Stehule
• 16:20   Re: [HACKERS] Transform for pl/perl Aleksander Alekseev
• 16:35   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping Jeevan Chalke
• 16:45   Sv: pspg - psql pager Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 16:46   could not receive data from WAL stream: SSL SYSCALL error: Success Thomas Munro
• 16:55   RE: User defined data types in Logical Replication Huong Dangminh
• 17:08   Re: Rewriting PL/Python's typeio code Anthony Bykov
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping Jeevan Chalke
• 19:12   Logical Replication and triggers Thomas Rosenstein
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Robert Haas
• 19:28   Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans? Robert Haas
• 19:35   Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans? Jesper Pedersen
• 19:37   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II Robert Haas
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Merlin Moncure
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans? Robert Haas
• 19:44   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Pavel Stehule
• 20:16   Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file David Steele
• 20:18   Re: Schedule for migration to pglister Stephen Frost
• 20:18   Re: Schedule for migration to pglister Stephen Frost
• 20:42   Re: pspg - psql pager Merlin Moncure
• 20:46   Re: pspg - psql pager Pavel Stehule
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures Merlin Moncure
• 21:10   Re: pspg - psql pager Nicolas Barbier
• 21:11   Re: pspg - psql pager Geoff Winkless
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg audit requirements David Steele
• 21:23   Re: Rewriting PL/Python's typeio code Tom Lane
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] moving some partitioning code to executor Robert Haas
• 21:51   Further simplification of c.h's #include section Tom Lane
• 21:56   Re: Separate leader buffer info and worker wait info in EXPLAIN output? Robert Haas
• 21:58   Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section Robert Haas
• 22:05   Re: Schedule for migration to pglister Noah Misch
• 22:05   Re: Schedule for migration to pglister Noah Misch
• 22:07   Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Antonin Houska
• 22:32   Updated macOS start scripts Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping Konstantin Knizhnik
• 23:20   Re: Updated macOS start scripts Mark Dilger
• 23:38   Re: pspg - psql pager Gibrain