Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa=AxuLKo2f1AKwLmvFoo3rr3j+SYHaJ5GVyx1PhhOJ0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans?  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks.  You're right.  Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does.

Committed.  I noticed that you didn't add the new GUC to
postgresql.conf.sample, so I did that.  But then I thought it didn't
really belong in the section you put it, so I moved it to
RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans?